DEMOCRARY IS AN ILLUSION MOSTLY IN OUR COUNTRY I HEARD EARLIER WRITTEN THAT DEMORACY IS A FARCE. SINCE THEN IT HAS RATHER DETERIORATED THAN HAVING BEEN IMPROVED. IT IS SAID THAT DEMOCRACRY IS THE BEST SYSTEM WHICH GIVES POWER TO THE PEOPLE OF ALL TYPES RICH OR POOR, UPPPER CASTES OR LOWER CASTES, IRRESPECTIVE OF RELIGION THEY BELONG TO AND PRACTICE ETC. AND THAT IS WHY IT HAS BEEN CALLED AND PRONOUNCED AS UNDER; DEMOCRACY IS OF THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE UNFORTUNATELY THIS PREAMBLE HAS BEEN FORGOTTEN AND NOW LOT OF ILLS HAVE DEVELOPED IN THE PRESENT DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM, SOME OF WHICH ARE ILLUSTRATED HEREUNDER: 1. MONEY AND STATUS POWER HAVE BECOME THE RULE OF THE DAY 2. CASTE SYSTEM HAS BEEN CREATED TO DIVIDE THE PEOPLE 3. RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN CREATED AND/OR ALLOWED TO INFLUENCE SELECTION OF REPRESENTATIVES 4. DYNASTICAL SYSTEM HAS DEVELOPED WHEREBY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, MINISTERS ETC. WANT TO BRING IN THEIR CHILDREN AT THE COST OF MERITORIOUS AND DESERVING PERSONS, ONLY ON THE BASIS OF RELATIONSHIP AND NOT BASED ON THE FACT WHETHER THEY DESERVE TO BE ELECTED OR NOT.. 5. ILLITERATE, INEXPERIENCED, RELIGIOUS BIGOTS, SCOUNDRALS AND CRIMINALS ARE GETTING ELECTED DUE TO INFLUENCE, MONEY POWER, FEAR, FALSE ILLUSIONS ETC. 6. THE MAIN REMAIN TO GET THE MAJORITY OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IRRSPECTIVE OF WHETHER THEY ARE CAPABLE TO CONTRIBUTE IN DELIBERATIONS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF SUBJECTS TO BE ENACTED INTO LAW OR NOT, YES REMAINS THE SOLE CRITERIA TO GET DESIRED PROJECT ENACTED INTO LAW WHATEVER IS WISHED FOR BY THE GOVERNNG PARTY, WHICH IN OHER WORDS CAN BE TERMED .. MAJORITY RULE. 7. WORST HAS ALSO HAPPENED, THOSE IN TOP POSITION ONCE ELECTED, HAVE SUCCEEDED TO REMAIN IN THAT POSITION TILL THEIR LIFE AS WE SEE IN THE CASE OF RUSSIA, TURKEY, ETC. ETC. 8. PRIME MINISTER, CHIEF MINISTERS, PRESIDENT, GOVERNORS ETC. WORK FOR THE PARTY RATHER THAN TO EXERCISE AND EXECUTE THEIR VERDICT AS HEADS OF THE NATION, WHICH RESULTS IN DIVIDE AND RULE AND EXERCISE OF ALL INFLUENCES IN THE INSTITUTIONS AND BUREAUCRACY ETC. THERE ARE AND MAY BE MANY OTHER ISSUES AFFECTING THE WELL INTENTENTIONED SYSTEM AND INTRODUCTION OF DEMOCRARY AND DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM BY ENVISAGING AND WRITING DOWN ALL LAUDABLE WISHES, ASPIRATIONS AND EXPECTATIONS INTO CONSTITUTION. AS FOR SOME ANSWERS ARE CONCERNED, I SHALL BE ADDRESSING IN THE FOLLOWING WRITE-UPS; ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Analysed and written down by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept cost free marriage burea NGO to contact vasdevloond 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com PART--II  

MONEY AND STATUS POWER HAVE BECOME THE RULE OF THE DAY.

THERE IS NO DOUBT, NOW IN THE PRESENT AGE, EVERYTHING REVOLVES AROUND MONEY AND WITHOUT MONEY NOTHING MOVES, EVEN RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FAMILIES AND  FRIENDSHIPS  HAVE NO SIGNIFICANCE, ALL HAVE BECOME IRRELEVANT AND  ARE BROKEN FOR THE SAKE OF MONEY. EVEN HUSBAND AND WIFE DO NOT TRUEST EACH OTHER,  THEIR LOYALTY HAS BECOME FRAGILE AND AS SUCH TEMPTATION OF MONEY AND POSITION,  INFLUENCE AND BREAK THEIR RELATIONSHIP. THIS IS A RACE, WHICH IS MORE AND MORE ON THE INCREASE, WHERE IT WILL END IS DIFFICULT TO PREDICT AT THE MOMENT.

IN DEMOCRACY. AT THE TIME OF ELECTION, EXPLOITATION TAKES PLACE BY ALL MEANS BY CURRUPTING THE PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY THE POOR ONES, BY BRIBING, OFFERING DRUGS, DRINKS, AND WHAT NOT.  RICH CURRUPT THEM BY MONEY, FALSE PROMISES WHILE SCOUNDRAL CREATE FEAR OF ALL SORTS INCLUDING RISK TO LIFE AS WELL.

THE POOR, ILLITERATE AND NEEDY PERSONS ALSO KNOW AND BELIEVE THAT SOON AFTER SUCH D PERSON WILL GET ELECTED, HE/SHE WILL FORGET THEM AND WILL RETURN TO THEM ONLY WHEN THERE WILL BE NEXT ELECTION, AS SUCH THEY TRY  THEIR BEST TO EXTRACT AS MUCH AS THEY CAN INDIVIDUALLY , IN GROUPS, IN CLANS ETC.

HENCE IN TODAY’S WORLD, THE RICH AND PERSONS WITH INFLUENCE AND STATUS, KNOW IT VERY WELL THAT WITH MONEY AND RESOURCES THEY CAN BUY ANYTHING AND MANUPULATE VOTES IN ANY MANNER, THROUGH THE PEOPLE, THROUGH  BUREAUCRATIC SET UP, BY CORRUPTING THE PARTY, ALL OVER AND EVERYONE.  ALL THIS THEY DO, BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHEN ELECTED, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO AMASS POWER, MONEY, LAND, ASSETS NOT ONLY FOR THEM BUT ALSO FOR GENERATIONS TO COME AND THERE WILL BE NO STOP NEITHER BY THE PARTY, NOR BY LAW, NOR BY INSTITUTIONS  NOR BY HIERARCHY ETC.

THE POORER THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE, THERE DOES BECOME THE RULE OF MONEY, STATUS AND POSITION.

HAVING SAID ALL THESE FACTS, NOW THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHAT IS THE ANSWER.

1.       FUNDING BY GOVERNMENT FOR ELECTIONS WILL REDUCE THESE ILLICIT MEANS TO A GREAT EXTENT.

2.       RESTRICTIONS NEED TO BE BROUGHT ON EXPENSES TO BE INCURRED IN FIGHTING ELECTIONS.

3.       ALL RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARE PROHIBITED BY LAW FROM CANVASSING OR INFLUENCE THEIR CONGREGATIONS, GROUPS AND BELIEVERS.

4.       NO FOREIGN FUNDING AND/OR SABOTAGING ETC.

5.       TO ENSURE SOCIAL MEDIA TO REMAIN IMPORTIAL AND NO EXIT POLLS ETC AS ALSO NO

FAKE NEWS ARE ALLOWED.

6.       EDUCATION AND LITERARY WILL DO A LOT TO REDUCE AND/OR ELIMINATE THESE CORRUPT

MEANS, WHICH MEANS WHEN PEOPLE WILL BECOME CONSCSIOUS ABOUT THE VALUE OF THIEIR VOTE AND THAT IF JUDICIOUSLY EXERCISED, IT WILL BRING ABOUT TO THEM DEVELOPMENT AND WELFACE OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE.

REST OF THE SUBJECTS AS WRITTEN DOWN IN EARLIER MY NOTE FROM 1-8, WILL BE ATTEMPTED ONE BY ONE TO ILLUSTRATE AND SUGGEST ANSWERS AS TO HOW DOMOCRACY SHOULD FUNCTION BETTER, TO A GREAT EXTENT OF THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE.  

PART--III

CASTE SYSTEM HAS BEEN CREATED TO DIVIDE THE PEOPLE.

THERE IS NO DENIAL TO THIS FACT. INITIALLY, TO THE EXTENT I KNOW, IT WAS DIVISION WORK WHICH DIVIDED HINDUS INTO 4 SECTIONS TO FACILITATE THE WORKING AND GOVERNANCE.

AS THE TIME PASSED ON, THE DIVISION OF WORK AND THE TYPE OF WORK  BEING DONE BY EACH SECTION OF SOCIETY COMPRISING HINDUS, MUSLIMS AND ALL COMMUNITIES GOT DIVERTED AND CEMENTED INTO CASTES AND RELATIONSHIPS, TO THE EXTENT THAT UNTOUCHABILITY CAME INTO EXISTENCE, AND EACH CASTE AND COMMUNITY CREATED THEIR OWN CUSTOMS, DEALING BEHAVIOURS, CONDUCTING AND RESTRICTING MARRIAGES ETC. CREATING THEIR OWN ASSOCIATIONS, CONGREGATIONS, TEMPLES AND PLACES OF WORSHIPS ETC.

THE POLITICIANS PROFESSING THAT THEY WANT TO BETTER THE CONDITIONS OF THE UNTOUCHABLES AND POOR LOT, CATEGARISED THESE INTO ST, SC, OBC ETC. AND ACCORDING RESERVATIONS CAME INTO BEING.

POLITICALLY INSTEAD OF HELPING THESE ST, SC, OBCs TO GET ECONOMICALLY BETTER, THESE WERE AND ARE BEING USED AS VOTE BANK BY USING ALL SORTS OF MEANS TO EXPLOIT THEM AND GETTING THE VOTES.

IN THIS PROCESS SOME WHO COULD MANAGE TO GET INTO THE POLITICAL ARENA, ENRICHED THEMSELVES AND ARE IN NO MANNER LESS THAN THE SO CALLED UPPER CLASS SECTIONS OF SOCIETY.

THOUGH WITH EDUCATION AND GETTING INTO POLITICAL SET UP AS ALSO THROUGH RESERVATIONS, SOME OF THEM HAVE BETTERED OFF THEIR HIERARCHICAL AND FINANCIAL POSITIONS, BUT AT LARGE SUCH A SITUATION HAS CREATED MANY CONFLICTS ON CASTE BIASES AND CONFLICTS, RELIGION, BELIEF, CUSTOMS AND RELATIONSHIPS ESPECIALLY IN MARRIAGES, BESIDES CREATING GOVERNANCE PROBLEMS. BUT THE POLITICIANS HAVE GREATLY BENEFITED THROUGH RESERVATIONS AND SUCH SECTIONS BEING ILLITERATE, HAVE BEEN MOBILISED AS YES AND SHOW HAND MEN, RATHER THAN CONTRIBUTING MUCH AS WAS ENVISAGED,BESIDES IN CONTRAST ALL EFFORTS WERE MADE TO GET MAJORITY VOTE BANK, WHICH THESE POOR AND LOW CASTES CONSTITUTED AND CONTRIBUTED A LOT TO MANAVOUR IN THE MANNER THESE POLITICIANS WANTED AND ARE WANTING EVEN NOW.

NEEDLESS TO FORGET THAT SOME WHO DURING SUCH TRANSITIONAL PERIOD GOT EDUCATED, GOT INTO POLITICAL MACHINERY, HAVE RISEN TO THE POSITIONS OF  CHIEF MINISSTERS, GOVERNORS,                     PRESIDENT, JUDGES ETC. ETC.   BUT COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF SUCH POOR AND CLASSIED LOW CLASS SECTS AND COMMUNITIES, THOSE WHO HAVE RISEN TO SUCH HIGH POSITIONS ARE FEW AND NEGLIGIBLE.

NOW THAT WORST HAS HAPPENED BY CREATING CERTAIN CASTES AND CLASSIFYING THEM AS ST, SC AND OBCs AND ALSO BY CREATING RESERVATION, GREAT DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE THAN AMELIORATING THEIR CONDITION.

THEN THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHAT SHOULD BE THE ANSWER;

IN MY VIEW

1.       THESE RESERVATIONS AND CATEGORISATIONS SHOULD BE TOTALLY ABOLISHED.

2.       IN ORDER TO HELP THE POOR AND DOWN TRODDEN, THE CATEGORISATION SHOULD

BASED ON THEIR LIVING STANDARD AND POVERTY.

3.       SUCH PERSONS MUST BE GIVEN FREE EDUCATION, SOME SORT OF TEMPORARY RESERVATIONS ETC.

4.       NGOs, SOCIAL ORGANISATIONS, PHILANTHROPISTS, BESIDES GOVERNMENTS AID AND FACILITIES, MUST COME FORWARD TO EDUCATE THEM AND BETTER THEIR CONDITIONS

TO GET EDUATION AND BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY IN ORDER TO LIVE A RESSPECTABLE LIFE.

5.       FURTHER IT WILL HELP TO REDUCE THAT DISCRIMINATION IN SOCIETY AND REDUCTION OF CASTE CONFLICTS ETC.

6.       DEMOCRACY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEED ITS PEOPLE TO BE WELL EDUCATED

AS BEST AS POSSIBLE, AT LEAST BE ABLE TO READ AND WRITE AND UNDERSTAND RULES OF GOVERNANCE AND OBEDIENCE. HENCE WHEN SUCH LOW PAID PERSONS WILL GET EDUCATED AND ASSIMILATED INTO SO CALLED UPPER SECTIONS OF SOCIETY, THE ENVIRONMENTS FOR DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIC WORKING WILL IMPROVE.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Thoughts expressed by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.facebook.com

PART.. IV

RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN CREATED AND/OR ALLOWED TO INFLUENCE SELECTION OF  REPRESENTATIVES

THE PRESENT POSITION IS THAT SUCH ORGANISATION TO TAKE GRATIS AND FUNDS ETC. EXERCISE THEIR RELIGIOUS FORCE AND INFLUENCE IN THEIR ADHERENTS TO VOTE FOR SUCH AND SUCH PARTY, AS SUCH A STEP/ACTION WILL HELP THEIR ORGANISATION TO GET MANY JOBS DONE BY THOSE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, MINISTERS ETC. AND AS SUCH TO ACCELERATE THESE RELIGIOUS ACITIVITIES AND ENHANCE GROWTH ALSO IN OTHER STATES IN THE COUNTRY AND ELSEWHERE PARTICULARLY WITH COMMUNITIES OF THEIR BELIEF SETTLED IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES, TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENT.

IT IS A PITY BOTH, REPRESENTSTIVES AND RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS,TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EACH OTHER WHILE CREATION AND SET-UP OF RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS IS SOLELY TO PROPAGATE AND CONGREGATE MEN AND WOMEN WITH THEIR RELIGION, ITS BELIEFS AND TO KEEP THEIR ADHERENTS BOUND BY BELIEFS AND TRUTH OF THEIR RELIGION AND AS SUCH AVOID CONFLICT WITH OTHER RELIGIONS IN WHATSOEVER FORM AND BELIEFS THESE ARE.

IT IS UNDFORTUNATE AS IT IS THE DESIRE AND CRASE OF ALL OF US WHETHER IN BUSINESS AND/OR IN ANY OTHER ACTIVITY OR SECT, WE WANT TO LET IT GROW AS BIG AS IT IS POSSIBLE AND IN THE SAME RACE, ALL SUCH RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION IN THE DESIRE TO EXPAND THEIR BELIEF, INFLUENCE AND DOMINANCE, START TALKING ILL AND DISPARAGING OTHER RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS AND CULIMINATE AS ARTHODOX AND DOGMATIC , RIGID IN THEIR BELIEF AND ATTITUDE AND AS SUCH CREATE CONFLICTS WITH OTHER COMMUNITIES AND RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS. ALMOST ALL SUCH RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS HAVE ENGAGED IN CREATING CONFLICTS TO DOMINATE AND/OR ELIMINATE OTHERS, PREACHING AND ACTING AGAINST THEM AS THEIR FOES AND ENEMIES.

IT IS REALLY A PITIABLE SITUATION WHEREIN.  ALMOST ALL RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION ARE ENGAGING IN SUCH VICIOUS ACTIONS WHEN EACH AND EVERY RELIGION TEACHES US ALL TO BE TOLERANT, ACCOMMODATIIVE AND TO  LOVE ALL HUMAN BEINGS IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT BELIEF, CREED, RELIGION AND GENDER ALL OTHERS BELONG TO.

ANSWER IN MY VIEW LIES

1.       BY LAW RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION BE ALLOWED TO BE CREATED AND ESTABLISHED SOLELY

TO PREACH THEIR RELIGION AND ITS MERITS AND NOTHING ELSE.

      2,     THE MOMENT SUCH RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS ENGAGE THEMSELVES AND/OR INSTIGATE

               THEIR ADHERENTS, THEIR REGISTRATION MUST BE WITHDRAWN AND ALL THOSE WHO  

                INDULGE IN INSTIGATIONS ARE PUT BEHIND BARS.

2.        IF SUCH A RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION INDULGES IN CONVASSING VOTES FOR THOSE WHO

 ARE SEEKING ELECTIONS, SUCH ORGANISATIONS’ REGISTATION MUST BE CANCELLED AND ALL OTHER DESIRABLE ACTIONS TAKEN.

3.       ALL REPRESENTATIVE WHO INDULGE IN OR GET INTO SUCH RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIOS TO CANVASS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHATEVER MANNER OR FORM, SUCH DESIRING CANDIDATES SEEKING ELECTION, MUST BE DEBARRED FROM FIGHTING ELECTION  FOR  ONE  TERM AT LEAST.

                                                  ……………………………………………..

                                                             IMPORTANT NOTE

                                                             FOR ATTENTION OF

                                                             ALL MY FACEBOOK

                                                             FRIENDS AND READERS

PLEASE, THESE ARE MY SUGGESTIONS FOR VARIOUS ILLS AS I FEEL AND OBSERVE IN THE PRESENT FORM OF DEMOCRACY AND ITS FUNCTIONING AND AS FOR EXECUTION AND IMPLEMENTAT OF THESE ARE CONCERNED, I SHALL BE ADDRESSING THOSE MEASURES IN MY LAST CHAPTER OF DEMOCRACY AND ITS FUNCTIONING.    TKS 

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Envisaged by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com

PART-...V 

PART V.

DYNASTICAL SYSTEM HAS DEVELOPED WHEREBY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, MINISTERS ETC. WANT TO BRING IN THEIR CHILDREN TO BE ELECTED AT THE COST OF MERITORIOUS AND DESERVING CANDIDATES, ONLY ON THE BASIS OF RELTIONSHIP AND NOT BASED AT ALL ON THE FACT WHETHER THEIR CHIDREN DESERVE TO BE ELECTED AS REPRESENTATIVES OR NOT.

DYNASTICAL SYSTEM IS QUITE COMMON IN OUR COUNTRY WHERE WE FIND THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, MINISTERS ETC. ARE USING ALL TYPES OF INFLUENCE AND MEANS TO GET THE TICKET FOR THEIR CHILDREN TO FIGHT ELECTIONS AND GET ELECTED AND HARDLY THERE MIGHT BE A FEW EXCEPTIONS MAYBE THOSE WHO ARE NOT HAVING THEIR CHILDREN.

I FEEL THERE IS NO HARM IN THE DYNASTICAL SYSTEM AND ITS US ,IF THEIR CHILDREN  ARE CAPABLE AND CAN PUT FORWARD THE NEEDS AND ASPIRATIONS OF THE CONSTITUENTS OF THE CONCERNED CONSTITUENCY, THEY WANT TO SEEK ELECTION FROM., IN THE SAME MANNER AS IN BUSINESS AND IN ALL ACTIVITIES, EACH PARENT WANTS TO BRING IN THEIR OWN CHILDREN IN THE BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY THEY ARE EXERCISING AS OWNERS, IT IS A REALITY AND IS AN ACCEPTABLE NORM.

THEN WHAT IS REQUIRED IN ANSWER, I FEEL, IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT

1.       SUCH CHILDREN MUST BE GROOMED ON GROUND TO FIGHT ELECTIONS AT LOWER LEVEL AND THEN MOVE ON TO HIGHER REPRESENTTIVE POSITIONS WITH FULL EXPERIENCE ON THE GROUND AND PROBLEMS RELATED THERETO.

2.       IF SUCH CHILDREN HAVE BEEN WORKING IN THE PARTY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND HAVE

SHOWN THEIR CAPABILITY TO BE REPRESENTED.

3.       THE PARTY AND THE PUBLIC FIND SUCH CHILDREN QUITE ABLE TO REPRESENT FULLY THE

IDEOLOGY OF THE PARTY AND REPRESENT ALSO THE CAUSES OF THE CONSTITUENCY, HE/SHE IS SEEKING ELECTION FROM AND IS KEEN TO FULLY NOURISH HIS/HER CONSTITUENCY BY REPRESENTIVNG ITS PROBLEMS AND MAKES HIMSELF/HERSELF DUTY BOUND TO MEET THE CONSTITUENTS QUITE OFTEN TO LISTEN TO THEM AND ALSO ABOUT THEIR PROBLEMS TO ENSURE THAT HE/SHE IS ACCEPTED AND IS APPRECIATED TO BE THEIR REPRESENTATIVE AND IS HEARING THEIR WOES AND DOES HIS/HER BEST TO GET THEM RELIEVED AS BEST AS HE/SHE CAN. HENCE FAITH AND CONFIDENCE ARE ESSENTIAL TO GROOM HIS/HER CONSTITUENCY BY RAISING VOICE IN THE ELECTED FORUM AND BY SERVICE TO HIS/HER CONSTITUENTS.

4.       FURTHER IT IS SAID AND IS ALSO IS A FACT THAT CHILDREN GET AT LEAST 50% LEARNING OF

THE VOCATIONS THEIR PARENTS ARE EXERCISING AND IN POLITICS THERE IS NO EXCEPTION

TO THIS FACT EITHER.

5.       THE ONLY FACT REMAINS AND NEEDS TO BE TAKEN, THAT SUCH CHILDREN ARE ALLOWED TO REPRENT AND GET ELECTED ON THE BASIS OF MERIT AND EXPERIENCE AND NOT, NEVER

BY INFLUENCE NOR ON THE BASIS THAT HIS FATHER/MOTHER IS IN A POSITION TO FORCE

SELECTION OF HIS/HER CHILD OVER AND ABOVE THE RIGHT OF THE DESERVING CANDIDATE

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Explained and elaborated by .vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www. Facebook.com

PART...VI

             DEMOCRACRY IS AN ILLUSION MOSTLY IN OUR COUNTRY … PART VI

ILLITERATE, EXPERIENCIED, RELIGIOUS BIGOTS, SCOUNDRALS AND CRIMINALS ARE GETTING ELECTED DUE TO INFLUENCE, MONEY POWER, FEAR FALSE PROMISES ETC.

THERE IS NO DOUBT WHEN ALL SUCH PESONS, AS CITED ABOVE, ARE ELECTED, THEIR MAIN AIM TO AMASS MONEY AS MUCH AS THEY CAN.  FOR INSTANCE

1.       WHAT RELIGIOUS BIGOTS HAVE TO DO IN ASSEMBLIES AND PARLIAMENT, THEY ARE RELIGIOUS AND BELIEVERS IN RELIGIION, THEN THEY MUST RESTRICT THEMSELVES TO RELIGION AND THEIR BELIEF ALONE.

2.       SCOUNDRALS AND CRIMINALS, WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO IN ASSEMBLIES AND PARLIAMENT, JUST TO AMASS MORE INFUENCE FOR NOT BEING PUT TO JAIL ETC. AND AT THE SAME TIME TO CREAE HOOLIGANISM  IN THE ASSEMBLY OR PARLIAMENT WHEREIN SUCH PERSONS ARE ELECTED

3.       INFLUENCE AND MONEY POWER HAVE ALSO THE SAME PURPOSE, TO AMASS MORE AND MORE MONEY, POSITIONS ETC. ETC. AND AS SUCH EXPLOIT THE POOR BY MONEY, POWER,

FEAR, FALSE PROMISES ETC. AS THEY ARE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR VOTERS  EXCEPT TO GET VOTES FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE BY ALL MEANS WITH LEAST INTEREST AFTER BEING ELECTED FOR THEIR VOTERS.

THEN WHAT COULD BE THE ANSWER:

1.       FIRST AND PRIMEMOST IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THOSE WE ARE TO BE ELECTED TO THE

REPRESENTATIVE INSTITUTIONS MUST BE LITERATE, SUFFICIENTLY EDUCATED, SO THAT

THEY CAN READ AND WRITE AND AS SUCH UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS AND REAL

SENSE OF THE LAWS TO BE ENACTED AND THE DRAFTS BEING PUT UP FOR DISCUSSION, DELIBERATION AND FOR OFFERING THEIR VIEWS AND IF THEY ARE NOT EDUCATED, HOW

CAN THEY  READ THE DRAFT, UNDERSTAND ITS IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGEST SOME

ANSWERS FOR DISCUSSION/IMPROVEMENT ETC.

LET IT BE VERY CLEAR, WHEN I SAY THAT ONE MUST BE EDUCATED AND MUST BE LITERATE, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT ONE MUST BE EDUCATED IN ENGLISH OR HINDI, THE REPRESENTATIVE MAY BE LITERATE IN THE LANGUAGE OF HIS STATE ETC. AS THE DRAFTS AND DISCUSSIONS THROUGH TECHNICAL AIDS ARE TRANSALTED IN THE LANGUAGE AS IS DECIDED BY THE ASSEMBLY, OR PARLIAMENT CONCERNED IRRESPECTIVE OF INWHATEVER LANGUAGE THE REPRESENTATIVE SPEAKS..

HENCE IRRESPECTIVE OF THE LANGUAGE, THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE EDUCATED AND

LITERATE.

       2,    AS FOR SCOUNDRALS AND CRIMINALS ARE CONCERNED, WHEN THEY HAVE LEARNT TO

              BREAK THE LAW, THEN WHAT IS THEIR NEED TO BE ELECTED EXCEPT FOR THEIR BENEFIT FOR

ACQUITAL. ASSEMBLIES AND PARTLIAMENT ARE MADE TO ENCACT LAWS WHICH CAN BE DISCUSSED AND DELIBERATED BY THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN LAW AND ARE LAW ABIDING.

     3     POSSIBLY THOSE WHO WANT TO EXERCISE INFLUENCE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEIR

            INFLUENCE OR POWER MAY BE EDUCATED, BUT THEIR AIM IS PERSONAL AND NOT  FOR

           THE INTEREST THE VOTERS, SUCH PERSONS WILL TAKE ADVANTAGE BY BEING ELECTED AND

           USE POSSIBLY SOME OF THESE RESOURCES AGAIN TO EXPLOIT AND GET VOTES FROM THEIR

       CONTITUENCIES AS IT IS THEIR BELIEF AND PRACTICE AND ARE ALSO CONFIDENT ENOUGH THAT

BY THEIR USUAL MEANS, WE WILL SURELY BE ABLE TO GET VOTES AND GET ELECTED.

HENCE ESSENTIAL THAT EDUCATED AND LITERATE IRRESPECTIVE IN WHATEVER LANGUAGE THEY ARE EDUCATED, NEEDS TO BE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENT SO THAT THEY CAN FULLY UNDERSTAND, DELIBEATE AND ADVANCE THEIR VIEWS CORRECTLY FOR THE CHANGES TO BE ACCEPTED OR REJECTED.

 LIKEWISE SCOUNDRALS, LAW BREAKERS, CRIMINALS BY LAW MUST BE RESTRICTED FROM FIGHTING ELECTIONS.

SIMILARY RELIGIOUS BIGOTS WHO WANT TO FIGHT ELECTION ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION MUST

BE RESTRICTED TO PREACH THEIR RELIGIION IN THE SOCIETY AND ASSEMBLIES OF THEIR BELIEFS AND NOT IN ASSEMBLIES AND PARLIAMENT.  THERE IS MEDIA, NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, JOURNALS ETC. THROUGH WHICH THEY CAN EXPRESS THEIR IDEAS AND LET THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES KNOW ABOUT THEIR VIEWS TO BE ACCEPTED OR RJEJECTED.

LET US NOT FORGET THAT COUNTRY CONSISTS OF VARIOUS RELIGIONS AND AS SUCH DIVISION ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION NEED NOT BE ALLOWED NOR ENCOURAGED NOR ALLOWED TO BE REPRESENTED.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Views expressed by vasdevlooond founder of marriage guidance new concept cost free marriage bureau NGO to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in  www.facebook.com

 PART....VII

THE MAIN AIM REMAINS TO GET THE MAJORITY OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THEY ARE CAPABLE TO CONTRIBUTE IN DELIBERATIONS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF SUBJECTS TO BE ENACTED INTO LAW OR NOT, YES REMAINS THE SOLE CRITERIA TO GET TH DESIRED PROJECT/DRAFT ENACTED INTO LAW WHATEVER IS WISHED FOR BY THE GOVERNING PARTY, WHICH IN OTHER WORDS CAN BE TERMED MAJORITY RULE.

IT HAS BECOME NOW COMMON PRACTICE TO GET AS MANY REPRESENTATIVE AS A PARTY CAN WIN IN ORGER TO GET THUMPING MAJORITY AND AS SUCH ALL MEANS GOOD OR BAD ARE USED, RELIGION IS DIVIDED, ELECTIONS ARE FOUGHT ON CASTE BASIS, RESERVATIONS HAVE BEEN CREATED AS SUCH OF LOW-CASTE PEOPLE WHO ARE EASY TO GET EXPLOITED BY ILLICIT MEANS AND FALSE PROMISES. AS SUCH PERSONS ARE NOT ELECTED ON THE BASIS OF THEIR EXPERIENCE NOR HAVE THEY ANY KNOWLEDGE AS TO HOW DRAFT BILLS FOR LAWS ARE DISCUSSED AS ALSO DO NOT KNOW HOW TO ANALYSE WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE DRAFT BILL, MOSTLY SUCH PERSONS ARE PRESENT IN ASSEMBLIES AND PARLIAMENT JUST TO RAISE THEIR HANDS AS “yes” MEN AND THE MAJORITY PARTY THUS  GETS THE BILL PASSED EASILY  IN THE MANNER THEY WANT, MOSTLY AVOIDING TO SEND THE DRAFT BILL TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE STUDY PROPERLY. CALL VIEW OF THE  PERSONS/SECTION OF SOCIETY AND TJIS GIVE ITS FULLY DELIBERATED VIEWS.

SUCH THUMPING MAJORITY PRACTICE IS  CONTRARY TO DEMOCRACY AND ALSO ITS FUNCTINING WHERE IT IS ESSENTIAL TO FULLY DELIBERATE ON THE DRAFT BILLS AND CONTRIBUTE THEIR BEST BY VOICING AND EXPLAINING THEIR VIEWPOINTS, WHICH DOES NOT HAPPEN IN THUMPING MAJORY PARTY.

IN ORDER TO AVOID SUCH EXPLOITATION WITH AIM AND DESIRE TO GET YES MEN AS A THUMPING MAJORITY, I THINK IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT

1.       THE CANDIDATE WHO WANTS TO GET  ELECTED OR IS SELECTED FOR EECTION BY HIS/HER PARTY, MUST HAVE MINIMUM ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION AS GRADUATE.

2.       MUST BE FULLY GROUNDED WITH EXPERIENCE FROM THE ELECTED BODIES LIKE LOCAL

PANCHAYATS, CORPORATIONS ETC. AND THEN GET TO ASSEMBLIES AND PARLIAMENT

EQUIPPED WITH ENOUGH EXPERIENCE OF THE DESIRES OF HIS/HER CONSTITUENCY

TO PUT FORWARD AND AS SUCH CONTRIBUTE HIS/HER BEST IN ENACTMENT OF LAWS.      

3.       ELECTION COMMISSION NEEDS TO STRICTLY GET SUCH LIKE STIPULATIONS ADHERED

AND IMPLEMENTED.

4.       SINCE WITH SUCH RESTRICTIONS IT WILL NOT BE EASY TO GIVE TICKETS UNLESS ONE IS

GRADUATE AND IS NOT HAVING  GROUND EXPERIENCE, IT WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR A PARTY TO FIND MANY CANDIDATES, HENCE YES MEN WILL NOT GET ENTERED INTO ASSEMBLIES

AND PARLIAMENT, THINNER MAJORITY WILL COME INTO BEING AND ACCORDING THE DRAFT BILLS WILL BE  FULLY DELIBERATED BY THE RESPRENTATIVES AND ALSO WELL STUDIES AND WELL ANALYSED VIEWS FROM THE SELECT COMMITTEES WILL COME FORWARD.

5.       IT WILL POSSIBLY  HRLP IN AVOIDING IMPOSITION OF IDEOLGY OF A PARTICULAR

SECTION OR RELIGION ETC. IF THERE ARE NO YES MEN.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

 PART... VIII.

WORST HAS HAPPENING AND IS HAPPENING THAT THOSE IN TOP POSITION ONCE ELECTED, HAVE SUCCEEDED AND ARE SUCCEEDING TO REMAIN IN THAT POSITION TILLTHE LIFE AS WE SEE IN CASE OF RUSSIA, TURKEY ETC.

IT IS A FACT THAT DEMOCRACY IS NOT MEETING THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE PEOPLE IN THE SENSE IT WAS CONCEIVED – DEMOCRACY IS OF THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE

AND PEOPLE ARE AS SUCH GETTING FRUSTRATED WITH DEMOCRACY AND ITS FUNCTIONING,

FURTHER WE ALSO SEE THAT DEMOCRACY HAS MORE OR LESS BECOME A MONEY POWER. THOSE WHO HAVE MONEY VITIATE THE MEDIA BY FUNDING FOR THEIR PROGRAMMES AND AS SUCH MANGE TO MANAPOLISE AND INFLUENCE THE PEOPLE TO THINK OF HIM/HER AS THE BEST CHOICE WITH HIS/HER VISION, PROGRAMMES AND THE STATUS HE/SHE HOLDS AT PRESENT. NOT ONLY THIS SOCIAL MEDIA, EVEN RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS ARE ALSO BRIBED TO CANVASS VOTES FOR HIM/HER AS THE BEST AND SOLE PERSON TO BRING ABOUT THE DESIRED CHANGES AND WORK FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THEM AS ALSO DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTRY. 

IN CERTAIN COUNTRIES LIKE IRAN, RELIGION HAS BECOME THE DOMINANT FACTOR AND THROUGH THIS MODE, A FEW HAVE COME TO CONTROL THE COUNTRY, THROUGH THEM ALONE FOR THE BETTERMENT AND PRIDE OF THE COUNTRY.

FURTHER EVERY DAY, WE FIND THAT ALL PROMISES ARE MADE AND THEREAFTER THE REPRESENTATIVES ALSO THE GOVERNING PARTY AND ITS CONTRTOLLING AND GOVERNING HEADS WORK OUT EACH AND EVERYTHING FOR THE PARTY, THERE ARE FIGHTS AND CONFLICTS ALSO HAPPEN AND/OR CREATED TO ENRICH THEIR PARTY AND EMPLOY ALL MEANS TO DESTROY THOSE IN OPPOSITION.   IT AGAIN IS PERCEIEVED AND FOUND BY THE PEOPLE THAT DEMOCRACY IS A MEANS AND METHOD TO CREATE DIVISIONS THAN UNITING THE PEOPLE AND KEEP HARMONY AMONGST THEM ALL IRRESPECTIVE OF BELIEFS, RELIGION, CASTE AND CREED..

IT IS ALSO OBSERVED THAT MOST OF THE TIME IS WASTED IN ASSEMBLIES, PARLIAMENT ETC. IN ACCUSING EACH OTHER AND AT TIMES IN HIGH HANDEDNESS AND/OR ONE SIDED MAJORITY, THOSE IN OPPOSITION FEEL NEGLECTED, FURSTRATED, NOT BEING HEARD ETC., GET INTO HOOLIGANISM, HOUSES ARE ADJOURNED AND AS SUCH PUBLIC MONEY IS WASTED IN THEIR FIGHTS AND POWER STRUGGLE RATHER THAN BEING WORKING ABOUT THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE.

AS SUCH, THE SHREWD, POWERFUL, MANUPULATORS, GOOD VOCAL AND ORATORS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF FRUSTRATION OF THE PEOPLE WITH THE PRESENT SYSTEM AND PRESENT  ILLS AND MALNCTIONING OF DEMOCRACY, MANAGE GET TO POWER, PLAN AND WORK OUT  ABOUT LARGE MAJORITIES, GET TO FINAL POWER OF HIERARCHY LIKE PRESIDENT ETC.  AND ONCE SUCH PERSONS GET TO  THIS HIGHEST POSITION AS LEADER AND COMMANDER OF THE NATION, THEY MANAGE TO GET LAW PASSED FOR HIM/HER REMAINING AT PRESENT AND THE LIKE IN THAT POSITION TILL HIS/HER LIFE ORALTERNATIVELY  CONFLICTS AND REVOLTS ARE CREATED OR HAPPEN OF DIFFERENT INTERESTS AND/OR BY OPPOSITION. THUS HEREAFTER, THE PERSON AT THE HELM, MANAGES TO CONTROL THE NATION AND THE COUNTRY AS A SOLE COMMANDER, BY KEEPING YES AND SHOW OF HANDS LEGISTRATURES AND/OR TOTALLY ABLOSIH THE SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS ETC.

AS THE ENTIRE GOVERNANCE RESTS WITH ONE PERSON, HE/SHE SHOWS IN THE BEGINNING BETTER RESULTS, AND THEREAFTER AFTER A FEW YEARS, CORRUPTION AND BUREAUCRACY OVERTAKES AND AS SUCH THE INTERESTS OF THE PEOPLE ARE ORVERLOOKED

HENCE REVOLTS TAKE PLACE AND PEOPLE AGAIN WISH TO RETURN TO DEMOCRACY AS THE BETTER ANSWER. THIS PROCESS AS SUCH HAS CONTINUED AND WILL CONTINUE PERHAPS FOR EVER.

FINALLY SUCH PERSONS WHO GET TO POWER LIKE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE, ARE EITHER THROWN AWAY BY REVOLTS, OR THROUGH MILITARY UPHEAVALS AND/OR KILLED.WITH EXCEPTION SOME MANAGE BY PROPAGATING IN THE NATION AGAINST OTHER NATIONS, PREPARING AND ENGANGING IN WAR LIKE HEROS AND CONTINUE HOLDING THEIR POSITION UNQUESTIONED AND UN-INTERRUPTED.

IN ANSWER, I WILL SAY THAT OUR LEADERS MUST APPRECIATE THE SACRIFICES MADE BY OUR FOREFATHERS TO BRING TO US THIS PRECIOUS FREEDOM AND DO THEIR BEST TO LET THE DEMORARY AND ITS DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS FUNCTION AS THESE ARE WRITTEN DOWN IN THE CONSTITUTION AND AS PER ASPIRATIOS OF THE PEOPLE, IF UNFORTUNATELY IT IS NOT DONE, WORST WILL HAPPEN AS WE READ AND HAVE WITNESSED IN THE REGIMES OF KINGS AND DICTATORS, WHEREIN COMPLETE FREEDOM IS LOST, FEAR IS CREATED, BUREAUCRACY DOMINATES, CORRUPTION RULES IN EVERY SPHERE AND BY ALL MEANS. THUS WHEN EXTREMES HAPPEN, REVOLUTIONS TAKE PLACE, AND AGAIN PEOPLE TRY THEIR LUCK WITH DEMOCRACY AND SO-CALLED WELL WISHERS.

LET WE AND OUR LEADERS MUST NOT MISS THIS PRECIOUS OPPORTUNITY TO STRENGTHEN

DEMOCRACY AND ITS PROPER FUNCTIONING FOR THE PEOPLE AND OF THE PEOPLE..........................................

envisioned by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept cost free marriage bureau NGO to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com  

PART... IX

DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY… IX

PART.... X

MULTIPLE PARTIES ARE A BIG HEADACHE WHICH WORK FOR THEIR OWN INTERESTS THAN IN THE INTEREST OF ALL SECTIONS AND RELIGIONS OF SOCIEITY AS A NATION.

IT IS EASY TO GET A GROUP REGISTERED WITH CERTAIN FORMALITIES FROM THE ELECTION COMMISSION WITH 30 DAYS OF CREATION OF THE GROUP WITH SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES, MEMORANDUM ETC. ETC.

AS IT IS THE RIGHT OF EACH INDIVIDUAL TO PUT FORWARD HIS/HER VIEWS, ALL THOSE PERSONS PRESUMED TO BE OF SAME INSTERESTS GET TOGETHER AND GET THEIR GROUP REGISTERED AS A POLITICAL PARTY.

WHAT HAS THIS EASY REGISTRATION OF A POLITICAL PARTY  RESULTED IN, AS A RESULT THEREOF  THERE HAVE COME UP AND MUSHROOMED  MANY AND MANY POLITICAL PARTIES ON THE BESIS OF RELIGION, CASTES, RESERVED CATEGORIES, VESTED INTERESTS ETC. WHICH ARE JEAPORDISING THE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF ELECTED MAJORITY FALLING SHORT OF REQUIRED NUMBER OF MINIMUM OF ½ OF MAJORITY OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVEA. HENCE THE PRACTICE OF BARGAINING OF MINISTERIAL, COVETED POSTS, AND/OR BRIBING STARTS AND GOES ON TILL THE TERM OF THE ASSEMBY OR PARLIAMENT EXPIRES..

AS THESE SMALL PARTIES HAVE VESTED INTERESTS, THEY KEEP THE GOVERNING PARTY IN FEAR OF THEIR BREAKING AWAY AND JOINING THE OPPOSITION, THIS FEAR COMPELS THE GOVERNING PARTY TO OVERLOOK WHAT SORT OF BRIBES THEY ARE TAKING AND MISUSING THEIR POSITIONS BY ALL MEANS TO AMASS AS MUCH MONEY AS THEY CAN AND WITH THIS ENOURMOUS MONEY AND RESOURCES THUS MANAGED AND COLLECTED, DURING NEXT ELECTION, SUCH SMALL PARTIES AGAIN LURE THEIR VOTERS BY GIVING FALSE PROMISES AND ALSO BRIBING THEM, GET ELECTED AND THEN HEREAFTER THE RACE STARTS PARTICULARLY WHEN THERE IS A FACTURED GOVERNMENT AND/OR WITH THIN MAJORITY.

BESIDES THESE SMALL PARTIES, INDIVIDUALS ARE ALLOWED TO FIGHT ELECTIONS AS “INDEPENDENTS”. SHIFTING OF SUCH INDEPENDENTS FROM ONE PARTY TO THE OTHER BECOMES VERY EASY AS THE CLAUSE OF ‘DEFECTION’ DOES NOT APPLY TO SUCH INDEPENDENT ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE. IN ORDER TO EXERT PRESSURE OF ALL SORTS ON THE GOVERNING PARTY WHICH IS FACTURED OR IS HAVING THIN MAJORITY, FORM INTO A FORMIDABLE GROUP AND AS SUCH EXPLOIT THE GOVERNING PARTY BY ALL MEANS, LEAST TO TALK OF BRIBERIES  ETC.

……..

IN ORDER TO STOP THIS PRACTICE, IF FEEL, THIS MUSHROOMING OF INDIVIDUALS AS INDEPENDENTS AND/OR AS SMALL PARTIES BE CONSTITUTIONALLY STOPPED, WITH REASONS AND FOR THE SAKE OF SAFE AND FEARLESS FUNCTIONING OF THE ELECTED PARTY. 

IF SOMEHOW THIS CANNOT BE DONE , THEN IT MUST BE MADE COMPULSORY FOR SUCH SMALL PARTIES TO OPT FOR EITHER OF THE REGIONAL/STATE/NATIONAL PARTY AND AS SUCH FIGHT ELECTIONS ALONG WITH THE PARTY THEY HAVE OPTED TO CLUB WITH AND JOIN THEM.

THEN QUESTION ARISES IF SUCH VIEWS ARE ACCEPTED, THEN WHAT IS NEED OF CREATING THESE SMALL PARTIES. IN MY VIEW, SMALL PARTIES BECAUSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, CANNOT BE STOPPED FROM THEIR FORMATION AND REGISTRATIN AND PERHAPS IT IS NECESSARY ALSO THAT SUCH SMALL PARTIES BRING OUT THE ASPIRATIONS AND GRIEVANCES OF THE  SECTIONS, CONSTITUENCIES ETC. THEY ARE ELECTED FROM.

AS THESE SMALL PARTIES WILL BE PART OF THE REGIONAL AND/OR NATIONAL PARTY AND WILL FIGHT ELECTIONS WITH THEM, THUS THE QUESTION OF FACTURED GOVERNMENT WILL NOT EXIST, AND IF IT WILL EVER HAPPEN, THEN REFERENDUM SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE ANSWER.

WHEN SMALL PARTIES HAVE COMPULSORILY GET CLUBBD/MERGED WITH THE BIGGER REGIONAL OR NATIONAL PARTY AT THE TIME OF ELECTIONS. THERE SHALL NOT EXIST ANY SCOPE FOR INDIVIDUALS TO FIGHT ELECTIONS AS ‘INDEPENDENTS’.

NOTE: FOR RUNCOATS I SHALL BE ADDRESSING IN THE NEXT CHAPTER.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Envisioned and suggested by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond  at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com

 PART... XI

                  DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY……XI

TURNCOATS; ARE THOSE WHO ARE ELECTED ON THE TICKET OF A PARTY OR AS INDEPENDENT AND AFTER GETTING ELECTED, CHANGE TO OTHER PARTIES IRRESPECTIVE OF THE MANDATE ON WHICH HE/SHE WAS ELECTED.

IT IS SADDENING THAT IT HAS BECOME A COMMON PRACTICE AND BY THESE TURNCOATS IN MANY STATES LIKE MADHYA PRADESH. KARNATKA ETC. DULY MANDATED GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN TOPPLED.

THE QUESTION ARISES WHY THE ELECTED THE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE TICKET OF A PARTICULAR PARTY AND/OR WITH SPECIFIED AND DETERMINED IDEOLOGY, DECIDES TO LEAVE HIS/HER PARTY AND/ OR DOESN’T BOTHER ABOUT HIS/HER IDEOLOGY AS AGREED AND ACCEPTED OF HIS/HER PARTY OR THE CONSTUENCY WHERE HE/SHE WAS ELECTED FROM.

IT IS AN OPEN FACT THAT SUCH ELECTED MEMBER(S) DECIDE TO LEAVE THEIR PARTY AND THOSE WHO ARE ELECTED AS INDEPENDENTS ON A PARTICULAR VERDICT, MOVE ON TO ANOTHER PARTY, IT IS PURELY FOR THEIR PERSONAL GAINS AND NOTHING ELSE.

IT IS HAPPENING IN ALL STATES WHERE THERE ARE THIN MAJORITY GOVERNMENTS ESPECIALLY, THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE  LURED BY OPPOSION BY ASSURING AND GIVING SOME FAVOURS IN THE FORM OF MINISTERIAL BERTHS, BY DOLING OUT SOME BRIBES ETC. AND AS SUCH ELECTED AND MANADATED GOVERNMENTS ARE TOPPLED DOWN.

THE SPEAKERS RECENTLY HAVE STARTED TO DISQUALIFY SUCH TURNCOATS AND AS SUCH THESE TURNCOATS SEEK ELECTION AFTER A GAP OF, I BELIEVE, 6 MONTHS. IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED THAT SUCH RAINCOATS MOSTLY GET ELECTED AGAIN ON THE TICKET OF THE PARTY WHICH HAD LURED THEM OR BRIBED THEM AND AS SUCH THE MANDATED PARTY’S GOVERNMENTS ARE TOPPLED  AND THE OPPOSITION WHICH WAS NOT MANDATED, COMES TO POWER.

THEN WHAT COULD BE THE SOLUTION, IS A QUESTION.

I THINK AND WOULD SUGGEST VEHEMENTLY THAT SUCH TURNCOATS ARE BETRAYALS IN THE SENSE OF DEMOCRACY WHEREIN POWER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE PEOPLE, TO ELECT THEIR REPRESENTATIVE(S) BY THEIR CHOICE, AND HAVING GOT ELECTED BY THAT MANDATE, IT IS TOTALLY ILLOGICAL THAT THEY SHOULD VIOLATE THE MANDATE OF HIS/HER VOTERS.

IT COULD PERHAPS BE REPLIED THAT WHEN SUCH AN ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE LEAVES HIS PARTY AND LEAVES HIS ELECTED SEAT IN LEGISLATURE, THEN WHY SHOULD THERE A PROBLEM.  THE FACT REMAINS THAT THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SUCH ELECTECTED REPRESENTATIVES, WHOM WE CALL TURNCOATS, IS TO INDULGE INTO SUCH ACTS AS THEY ARE FEEL CONFIDENT AND ARE SURE TO GET ELECTED AGAIN BY THE PARTY THEY ARE JOINING AND/OR LURING THEIR OWN VOTERS ETC. ETC. AND AS SUCH THERE IS NO FEAR FOR BEING DISQUALIFIED BY THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.

HENCE IN MY VIEW, THE ANSWER REMAINS, AFTER DISQUALIFICATION, SUCH TURNCOATS MUST NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO FIGHT ELECTION AGAIN UNTIL THE TERM OF THE ASSEMBLY OR PARLIAMENT EXPIRES, AND EVEN FURTHER, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT SUCH RAINCOATS SHOULD NOT AND MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO FIGHT FOR RE-ELECTION AGAIN THROUGHOUT THEIR LIFE,SINCE  SUCH TURNCOATS DO NOT BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY AND DO NOT VALUE THE MANDATE GIVEN TO HMS/HER BY THE VOTERS. IT IS PURELY A BUSINESS VENTURE FOR THEM, AND AS SUCH THEY MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO SEEK RE-ELECTION THROUGHOUT THEIR LIFE ON CLEARCUT SPECIFIC REASON THAT IN A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM AND DEMOCRACRY, ONLY SUCH PERSONS NEED TO BE ELECTED WHO BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY, BELIEVE IN THE BETTERMENT OF THE PEOPLE AS A NATION AND ARE DETERMINED TO SERVE THEIR CONSTITUENCY AND THE PEOPLE AT LARGE PRIMARLY AS A SOCIAL SERVICE THAN AS A PLATFORM OF BUSINESS.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Views expressed by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept cost free marriage bureau, NGO to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmal.com  www.marriageguidance.in  www.facebook.com

 PART....XII

                        DEMOCRACRY IS AN ILLUSION ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY  … XII

IT IS NOT ONLY PROBLEM OF TURNCOATS, THERE IS ALSO A BIG MENACE :

1.       JUST AT THE TIME OF ELECTION AND AT TIME BEFORE FILING NOMINATION PAPERS. THOSE WHO FEEL THAT HE/SHE WILL NOT BE GETTING TICKET TO FIGHT ELECTION, CHANGES HIS OR HER PARTY TO FIGHT ELECTIION FROM ANOTHER PARTY OR AS INDEPENDENT.

2.       EACH PARTY HAS MADE ITS PRACTICE TO ELICIT AND CONVASS ELECTED MEMBERS/OR IMPORTANT MEBERS OF THE OPPOSING/OPPOSITE PARTY, BY ALL MEANS, IN ORDER TO GET THE INFLUENCE/HOLD OF THE CONCERNED REPRESENTATIVE OR INDIVIDUAL IN THE DESIRED CONSTITUENCY.

3.       THUS ALL TYPES OF FAVOURS ARE PROMISED, AND ALSO TO THOSE WHO INSIST FOR GETTING THETICKET, ARE PROMISED TICKET TO FIGHT ELECTION FROM THEIR PARTY, BEFORE SUCH REPRESENTATIVE OR PERSON CONCERNED COCRDES AND PROMISES FOR CHANGE OVER.

I FEEL SUCH CHANGE OVERS NEEDN’T BE ALLOWED AT ALL .

AND IF ALLOWED, THE RESTRICTION OF AT LEAST FOR ONE YEAR MUST BE IMPOSED BY

THE ELECTION COMMISSION IN ORDER TO AVOID, CURTAIL, OR MINIMISE SUCH PRATICE OF FAVOURS AND PROMISES OF ALL TYPES AND IN ALL MANNERS.

(b) OFFICIALS AND DIGNITARIES;

BESIDES THE REPRESENTATIVES AND INFLUENCIAL MEMBERS OF OPPOSING PARTIES, THERE ARE OTHERS, CALLED OFFICIALS AND DIGNITARIES HOLDING IMPORTANT POSITIONS, WHO LEAVE THEIR POSTS JUST A LITTLE BEFORE OR WHEN THE ELECTIONS ARE DECLARED.

THE QUESTION ARISES WHY SUCH PERSONS WHO HOLD IMPORTANT OFFICIAL POSITIONS OR DIGNITARIES LEAVE THEIR POSTS, I FEEL AND THINK, IT IS NOT FOR SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE, IN GENERAL, BUT HOPING THAT WHEN ELECTED, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE MUCH GAINS FOR THEM AND FOR THEIR CHILDREN AS WELL.  I SEE HARDLY ANY OTHER REASON ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS ALREADY VERY DIFFICULT TO GET SELECTED FOR THE POST(S) THEY ARE HOLDING AT PRESENT , THEN WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THEM TO LEAVE THEIR COVETED POSITIONS AND GET TO POLITICS, I FEEL, IT IS FOR NOTHING ELSE BUT PURELY TO GET BIGGER GAIN ETC..

WHEN SUCH OFFICIALS AND DISGNITARIES THINK OF LEAVING THEIR PRESENT JOBS AND/OR PROMISED BY A POLITICAL PARTY OR THE OTHER, DURING THEIR TENURE AND/OR AT LEAST DURING A YEAR OR SO, THEY MAKE USE OF THEIR INFLUENCE AND STATUS TO FAVOUR THE PEOPLE OF THE CONSTITUENCY WHEREFROM THEY INTEND TO FIGHT ELECTION OR ARE PROMISED TO FIGHT ELECTION AND MOST SERIOUS ENOUGH, AT TIMES SUCH OFFICIALS/DIGNITARIES ARE PROMISED SEATS IN THE UPPER HOUSE, RAJYA SABHA ETC. ETC.

IN ORDER TO AVOID SUCH PRACTICE, IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT COOLING TIME OF AT LEAST 5 YEARS MUST BE IMPOSED LEGALLY ON SUCH OFFICALS AND DIGNITARIES AS ANY SHORTER TIME, WILL ENABLE THEM TO EXERCISING THE INFLUENCE AND FAVOURS THEY HAD DOLED OUTDURING THEIR TENUR,  IN ORDER TO GET ELECTED AN/OR  BEING NOMINATED.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Analysed by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com wwe.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com

 PART....XIII

DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION, ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY    … XIII

INDIA IS A FEDERAL COUNTRY CONSISTING OF ALL STATES IN THE COUNTRY AND NOT A FEDERATION. CONSTITUTION AS SUCH PROVIDES INDIA A FEDERAL SYSTEM WHICH CONSISTS IN:

1.RIGID CONSTITUTIO; I. AMENDMENTS REQURE 50% MAJORITY IN BOTH HOUSES TO PASS

                                             THE AMENDMENT AS ALSO 2/3 MEMBERS PRESENT IN EACH

                                              TO PASS THE AMENDMENT.

2 DIVISION OF POWERS: (a)UNION LIST CONSTAINS 97 SUBJECTS OF NATIONAL

                                                IMPORTANCE LIKE DEFENCE, RAILWAYS , POSTS AND

                                                TELEGRAPHS, INCOME TAX, CUSTOM DUTIES  ETC.

                                             (b)STATES LIST CONSISTS OF LOCAL SUBJECTS LIKE PUBLIC HEALTH,

                                                   POLICE FISHERIES, FORESTS, INDUSTRIES ETC.

                                             © CONCURRNET LIST CONSISTS OF 47 SUBJECTS LIKE ELECTRICITY,

                                                   TRADE UNIONS, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL PLANNING, STAMP

                                                   DUTIES, DRUGS AND POISON, ELECTRICITY, NEWSPAPERS,  ETC.

3 JUDICIARY TITLED SUPREME COURT OF INDIA(a) HAS THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TO SETTLE

                                                                   DISPUTES BETWEEN UNION AND STATES AND TO ADJUDICATE

                                                    ON THE DECISIONS TAKEN BY  COURTS IN THE STATES,

                                                    SUBMITTED

                                                    BY AFFECTED PARTIES IN THE FORM OF APPEAL ETC.

                                                                                    (b) TO DECLARE A LAW AS

                                                                                           UNCONSTITUTIONAL IF IT CONTRAVENES

                                                                                            ANY PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

THROUGH THIS FEDERAL SYSTEM DIVISION OF POWERS/FUNCTIONS HAS BEEN DEVISED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT STATES DECIDE PRIMARILY ON ALL SUBJECTS WHICH RELATE TO THE STATE AND ITS PEOPLE AND FOR THIS PURPOSE STATES CREATE THEIR OWN LEGISLATURES TO PASS THE LAWS CONCERNING THE GOVERNANCE AND WELFARE OF ALL THE PEOPLE IN STATES IRRESPECTIVE OF WHAT COMMUNITIES THESE CONSIST OF AND WHAT BELIEFS THEY PRACTICE.

THE CENTRE THROUGH PARLIAMENT CONSISTING OF LOK SABHA  AND RAJYA SABHA

WHEREIN FOR THE LOK SABHA , NATIONAL ELECTION IS HELD AND FOR RAJYA SUBHA

MEMEMBERS ARE ELECTED  BY RESPECTIVE  STATE LEGISLATURES, WITH THE CENTRE HAVING RIGHT TO NOMINATE SOME MEMBERS.

NOW THE QUESTION COMES WHEN THERE IS THUMPING MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT BY A PARTICULAR PARTY AND ALSO HAS THUMPING MAJORITY OF THE STATES IN THE COUNTRY, IT CAN PASS ANY LAW WITHOUT GETTING TO SELECT COMMITTEES AND ALSO NOT CARING FOR THE STATES OPPOSING THE LAW.

THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT AS PER CONSTITUTION, OPPOSING STATES IF THEY HAVE 50%

MAJORITY, THEN THE LAW GETS BACK  TO PARLIAMENT FOR DISCUSSION AND

REPASSING INTO  LAW.

IN ORDER TO AVOID DIRE CONSEQUENCES WHEN A PARTY HAS THUMPING MAJORITY IN BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT AND ALSO IN THE STATES, INSTEAD OF 50%, IT MAY BE

REDUCED TO 25 TO 30%  IN ORDER TO SAFEGUARD THE SPIRIT OF DECROCAY WHICH CONSISTS IN DIALOGUE AND CONSULTATION AND THROUGH THIS SUGGESTION, EVEN

THOUGH  THE OPPOSING PARTY/PARTIES ARE WEEK AND THEIR INFLUENCE IS IN A FEW STATES ONLY , STILL THEIR REJECTION, CRITICISM AND VOICE IS HEARD AND PUT INTO CONSIDERATION IN ORDER TO AVOID ANY DICTATORIAL POWER BY THE MAJORITY PARTY.

JUDICIARY, WITH REGARD TO THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS INDEPENDENT BY CONSITUTION IS RESTRICTED AS CHIEF JUSTICES FOR THE STATES AND THE SUPREME COURTS ARE APPROVED BY THE CENTRE.

I THINK WHEN APPROVAL POWER IS VESTED WITH SOMEONE, HE/SHE EXERCISES ALL INHERENT POWERS TO REJECT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT

AND/OR INSIST ON SELECTIONS OF THEIR CHOICE.  I THINK IT IS PERVERSION OF

INDEPENCE OF THE SUPREME  AND ITS FUNCTIONING.

BEING INDEPENDENT BY CONSTITUTION IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT LIKE THE CENTRAL GOVERNEMENT, IT HAS FULL POWERS TO SELECT ITS OWN CHIEF JUSTICIES, HAS

FINANCIAL POWERS THROUGH LEGISLATION AS IT IS PROVIDED TO THE RAIWAYS,

AND TOTAL GOVERNANCE OF LEGISLATURES VESTS WITH THE SUPREME COURT.

AS FOR ALL PURPOSES, PRESIDENT IS THE HEAD OF THE NATION TO SAFEGUARD

ITS INTERESTS AND TO OVERRULE ALL IRREGULARITIES AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS

AS PASSED BY THE PARLIAMENT AND THE CENTRE, LIKEWISE IF THE SUPREME COURT

COMMITS ANY IRREGULARITIES, THEN THE PRESIDENT UNDER ITS SUPREME POWERS

CAN OVERFULE AND GET IMPLEMENTED WHAT HE/SHE  DECIDES, HENCE THE ROLE OF THE PRIME MINSTER AND ITS CABINET, HIERARCHY, CONSTITUENTS ETC. IS AVOIDED, WHICH MANY A TIME CARRIES POLITICAL INTERESTS.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Views expressed are by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com wwe.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com. CAUTION;THESE ARE JUST PERSONAL VIEWS AND ARE NOT PREJUDICIAL OR BIASED IN ANY MANNER                                              

     PART... XIV

DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION, ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY  …. XIV

                                    SHOULD A PARTY WHO GETS MAJORITY SHOULD CONTINUE FOR THE WHOLE

                                    TERM OF 5 YEARS OR NOT, IS A QUESTION.

THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHAT IS THE NEED TO RAISE THIS QUESTION WHEN THE ELECTORATES HAVE MANDATED THEIR REPRESENTATIVES TO CONTINUE FOR 5 YEARS OF FULL TERM AND TO JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS WHEN NEXT ELECTIONS  TAKE PLACE AFTER 5 YEARS

UNFORTUNATELY IT IS NOT HAPPENING THAT DESPITE BEING VOTED FOR FULL TERM, TURNCOATS, SMALL PARTIES, GROUPS, INDEPENDENTS, IN ORDER TO GAIN CERTAIN POSITION AND/OR ECONOMIC GAINS, MANAGE THE MAJORITY TO TURN INTO MINORITY BY ABSENTING AND GETTING RE-ELECTED OR BY ESCAPING THE RELECTION, FORM A GROUP OF, I THINK 10% OF TOTAL NUMBER OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, CHANGE FROM MAJORITY PARTY TO THE MINORITY PARTY AND THUS MANAGE THE MAJORITY TO TURN INTO MINORITY, THE GOVERNMENT FALLS, AND AS A RESULT THEREBY, THE PARTY WHICH WAS IN MINORITY, GETS THE MAJORITY AND FORMS THE GOVERNMENT.

SUCH PRACTICE 1. NOT ONLY BRINGS INSTABLITY IN THE MAJORITY PARTY 2. ENCOURAGE MAL PRACTICES OF ALL SORTS 3. VITIATES THE MADATE OF THE VOTERS 4. FEAR SYCHOSIS REMAINS ALL THE TIME IN THE MAJORITY, AND AS SUCH THEIR EFFICIENT GOVERNANCE GETS AFFECTED AND HAMPERED A LOT.

BESIDES SUCH A PRACTICE WHICH COSTS A LOT IN ELECTIONS AND RE-ELECTIONS, IT DRAINS OUT LOT OF MONEY WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN USED FOR WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AND ALSO CAUSES

ENOURMOUS STRAIN AND UNCETAINTY.

IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE IF THE  MANADATE IS ENFORCED, THEN CORRUPTIONS AND INEFFICIENCY OF ALL SORTS WHICH BREEDS  IN FULL  CONFIDENCE AND  CERTAINTY THAT NOTHING CAN BE DONE TO THEM BEFORE 5  YEARS TERM, WILL POSSIBLY TAKE PLACE AND GROW DURING THE ENTIRE TERM EXCEPT PERHAPS IT MAY NOT HAPPEN DURING THE LAST YEAR OF THE TERM. IN ORDER TO SHOW

THE PEOPLE DURING RE-ELECTION, THAT THEY ARE CLEAN AND HAVE DONE ALL TO FULFIL THEIR PROMISES. IT IS TRUE ALSO AS THE TIME PASSES, ONE FORGETS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST AND GETS WAYED OFF BY THE PRESENT ACTIONS AND PROMISES OF HIS/HER REPRESENTATIVE.

NOW THE QUESTION IF THE GOVERNMENTS FALLS DURING THE 5 YEAR TERM DESPITE THE THESE HAVE BEEN VOTED FOR 5 YEARS, DOES EFFECT THE PROPER GOVERNANCE AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE, AS ALSO IF FULL TERM OF 5 YEARS IS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, THEN POSSIBILITY OF CORRUPTION FOR PERSONAL GAINS DOES CERTAINLY EXIST, THEN IN BOTH THE WORST SITUATION, WHAT IS THE RIGHT COURSE TO BE ADOPTED.

I THINK AGITATIONS, REVOTS AND REVOLUTIONS WILL CERTAINLY TAKE PLACE DULY PLACATED BY THE OPPOSITION PARTY/PARTIES AND IN ORDER TO AVOID DAMAGES AND LOSSES OF ALL SORTS

IN PROPERTIES, BY RESORT TO FIRING AND KILLING THE PROTESTORS, RE-ELECTIONS WILL BE ORDERED AND MOSTLY THE PRESENT UNSATISFACTORY GOVERNMENT AND ITS REPRESENTATIVE MAY NOT GET RE-ELECTED.   I AM SURE AND BELIEVE VEHEMENTLY IF RE-ELECTION IS DONE IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES OF REVOTS ETC. THEN THE NEXT ELECTED GOVERNMENT WILL DO THEIR BEST TO FULFILL THEIR PROMISES IN FEAR THAT IF THEY DID NOT PERFORM AS THEY HAD PROMISED AND FAIL TO CREATE CONFIDENCE IN THE PEOPLE, MOST LIKELY THEY WILL MEET

THE SAME FATE, AS THE EARLIER GOVERNMENT HAD MET. HENCE FOR 1-2 TERMS AT LEAST THERE WILL BE GOOD GOVERNMENANCE FOR THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AND IF CORRUPTION, INEFFICIENCY AND MAL-PRATICES HAPPEN THEREAFTER, THEN THE REPRESENTATIVES  OF SUCH GOVERNMENT MAY LOSE THE ELECTION AND MAY NOT GET ELECTED.

HENCE IN CONCLUSION, I WILL SAY IT IS BETTER TO ALLOW THE ELECTED GOVERNMENTS CONTINUE FOR FULL TERM AS MANADATED BY THEIR VOTERS..

...................................................................................

thoughs expression by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO to contact vasdevloond 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.cpm

    PART..... XV

                              DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION, ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY  …. XV

FEEBIES: ALL SORTS OF FEEBIES ARE OFFERED AT THE TIME OF EECTION, WHY NOT EARLIER IS A

QUESTION, IS IT NOT WASTE OF TAX PAYERS MONEY AND WHY FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF SOCIETY AND NOT FOR ALL.

WHY FEEBIES OF ALL SORTS ARE PROMISED  AT THE TIME OF ELECTION, AND WHY NOT BFEORE?

FEEBIES ARE USED AND PRACTICED TO LURE THE VOTERS THAT THESE WILL BE GIVEN FREE IF BROUGHT TO POWER.  NOT ONLY THE TICKET HOLDER AND/OR THEIR PARTY EMPLOY FEEBIES AS A MEANS TO BE VOTED BUT THE ELECTORS ALSO IN THE CONSTITUENCY AND/OR IN THE ENTIRE AREAS OR STATES WHERE ELECTIONS ARE BEING HELD, WAIT FOR THE ELECTION TO BE DECLARED

AND THEREAFTER TO IMPOSE CERTAIN CONDITIONS TO CASTE THEIR VOTES IN FAVOUR OF THE  CONCERNED REPRESETATIVE AND/OR HIS/HER PARTY AND EXTRACT AS SUCH THE MAXIMUM TO CASTE THEIR VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND/OR THE PARTY IN CONTRAST TO THE OPPOSING ONES.

AS IT IS SAID THAT THE THIEF IS LESS CULPRIT THAN THE ONEWHO INCITES AND INSTIGATES FOR INDULGING IN AND/OR DOING THEFT. LIKEWISE IN THE SAME MANNER, THE ELECTORS ARE LESS CULPRITS THAN THEIR REPRESENTATIVE AND/OR HIS/HER PARTY AS WELL.

FURTHER QUESTION ARISES WHY FEEBIES ARE NOT OFFERED DURING THE TERM OF GOVERNANCE.

IT IS NOT DONE AS IT IS FELT THAT SUCH FEEBIES EVER GIVEN WILL BE TAKEN AND TREATED AS THE  RIGHT OF THE ELECTORS HAVING ELECTED HIM/HER.  BESIDES ALSO THESE FEEBIES ARE KEPT IN RESERVE TO COUNTER THE PROMISES AND FEEBIES BEING OFFERED BY THE OPPOSING REPRESENTATIVE(S) WHICH EACH AND EVERYONE USES TO INFLUENCE, IF NOT EXPLOIT, THE IGNORANCE AND/OR VESTED INTERESTS OF THE ELECTORS.

I WILL CALL THIS ACT OF OFFERING FEEBIES AT THE TIME OF ELECTION, NOT ONLY A PUNISHABLE CRIME BUT ALSO IN ADDITION IS ALDO JUSTIFIED TO DEBAR SUCH PERSONS AND PERHAPS THE PARTY FROM SEEKING ELECTION IF NOT FOR THE WHOLE LIFE, BUT IN NO CASE TO BE  LESS THAN 2 TERMS=10 YEARS.

TO OFFER FEEBIES AT THE TIME OF ELECTION DOES IT NOT AMOUNT TO GIVING FALSE PROMISES AND AVOID AND/OR NOT TO IMPLEMENT, ONCE HAVING BEEN GOT ELECTED. BESIDES, I WONDER, DOES THE PARTY IN POWER AND THAT/THOSE OPPOSING, HAVE DONE EXERCISE THAT THERE ARE ENOUGH RESERVES IN THE COFFRE TO FULFUL THE PROMISES OF DOLING OUT FEEBIES, WHICH, I AM CERTAIN, IS NEVER AND NEVER DONE AT ALL. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATIVE AS ALSO HIS/HER PARTY REMAINS TO GET ELECTED AND THEREAFTER, VARIOUS MEANS WILL BE USED TO PROCURE MONEY THROUGH ADDITIONAL TAXES, SOME UNENVISAGED SCHEMES AND/OR NOT FULLY MANIFESTED AND USED TO THEIR FULLEST AND/OR TO TAKE LAONS, STATES FROM THE CENTRE AND CENTRE FROM THE RESERVE BANK ETC. AND/OR SELLING OUT NATIONAL ASSETS ETC. ETC.

HENCE IN MY VIEW AS OFFERING FEEBIES AT THE TIMEOF  ELECTION IS SHEER EXPLOITATION OF THE IGNORANCE AND POVERTY OF THE ELECTORS BY THE CONTESTING REPRESENTATIVE(S) AND/OR

THEIR PARTY, MUST BE STOPPED BY LAW, ELECTION COMMISSION AND THE JUDICIARY AND INSTEAD THE DESIRING REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR THEIR PARTY MUST BE ORDAINED TO FIGHT ELECTION ON THE BASIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR AGENDA AND PROMISES HELD OUT TO THEIR ELECTORS BEFORE ELECTION AND NOT AT ALL ON THE BASIS OF

-          OFFERING FEEBIES

-          MAKING FALSE PROMISES

-          TO VILIFY ACCUSEAN ABUSE EACH OTHER IN THE ELECTION RACE.

-          …………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Written by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO

to contact vasdevloond through 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com

     PART..... XVI

              DEMOCRACRY IS AN ILLUSION ESPCIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY  …..    XVI

DONATIONS: it is common practice that industrialists and businessmen give donations to political parties and it is legally permitted.

The question arises, why donations are given to political parties which whether said or not, the fact remains that when that  political party will come to power and/or the political party which is in power at present , some sort of influence and concessions could be taken in the present working and/or in the future projects and undoubtedly donations in some manner or other will open up channel for the donor to access the higher ups and decision makers and as such get their work done. If not overtly said and/or accepted, it amounts to some  sort of bribe and nothing else.

Further if the donors have no business or personal interests, why do they not fund and donate to the welfare of the poor for their education, sanitation, aiding and helping them in skill development and job opportunities and/or providing jobs, housing etc. and so many the likes.

HENCE I AM OF THE VIEW THAT DONATIONS SHOULD BE STOPPED AND LEGALLY PROHIBITED WHICH WILL HELP IN FAIRPLAY OF THE WORKING OF THE HEIRARCHY AND THOSE IN POLITICAL POWER AND SITUATIONS AND WHATEVER PROJECTS ARE TO BE LAUNCHED, WILL BE GIVEN ON MERIT AND PROPER SCRUTINY AND IMPLIMENTATION TERMS WILL BE RIGOROUSLY APPLIED AND DEFAULTS IF ANY, WILL BE GOT DULY RECTIFIED AND COMPENSATED.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Views expressed by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond at phone 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in  www.facebook.com               

DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY …….  XVII

MOST OF THE TIME, THERE ARE FACTURED GOVERNMENTS AND ARE TOPPLED DOWN QUITE OFTEN AND AS SUCH VOTED TO MAJORITY EVEN THOUGH IN MINORITY ALONE, IS NOT ALLOWED TO CONTINUE AND AS SUCH THE MINORITY AND OTHER SPLINTER GROUPS GET TOGETHER AND AS SUCH THE FRACTURED MAJORITY PARTY LOSES ITS MADATE OF THE VOTERS, WHO HAVE VOTED FOR IT AS THE BEST OF ALL THOSE FIGHTING FOR ELECTION AS INDEPENDENTS, OR IN GROUPS OR IN A PARTY.

NOW THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO WHAT WOULD BE THE ANSWER TO AVOID SUCH SIUATIONS AND THAT

(a)    MANDATED VERDICT OF THE PEOPLE IS MAINTAINED FOR THE FULL TERM

(b)    HOW SUCH INDPENDEPENDENTS, SPLINTER GROUPS ETC. BE DISALLOWED TO DISLODGE THE MANDATED MAJORITY PARTY, EVEN THOUGH,  A FRACTURED ONE.

(c)    ARE THE INDEPENDENTS, SPLINTER GROUPS ETC. BE ALLOWED TO FIGHT

ELECTIONS ON THEIR OWN.

IN ANSWER TO IT, TO MY MIND IT IS CLEAR THAT IF THE DEMOCRACY IS TO FUNCTION IN A BETTER WAY, THE BEST ANSWER WILL BE THAT

                                          THERE IS 2-PARTY SYSTEM AND NO MORE AT ALL.

NOW IF TWO PARTY SYSTEM IS PASSED BY THE PARTLAMENT AND IS TO BE ENACTED, IMPLEMENTED AND GOT EXECUTED BY THE ELECTION COMMISION, HOW INDEPENDENTS AND SPLINTER GROUPS COULD BE DEBARRED FROM FIGHTING  ELECTION WHEN BY CONSTITUTION EACH ADULT CITIZEN HAS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FIGHT ELECTION AND EXPRESS HIS/HER VIEWS THROUGH ELECTED FORUMS LIKE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, ASSEMBLIES, PARLIAMENT ETC. ETC.

IN ANSWER TO THIS, ONCE IT IS A LEGAL OBLIGATION THAT THERE WILL BE ONLY 2-PARTY SYSTEM

THEN HOW BY ELECTION COMMISION THE INDEPENDENTS AND SPLINTER GROUPS WILL BE ACCOMODATED, THE ANSWER SEEMS TO BE:

(a)    All independents and splinter groups are allowed to fight election

(b)   But to ENSURE THAT SUCH INDEPENDENTS AND SPLINTER GROUPS

ADHERE AND ACCEPT THE PHILOSOPHY, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

OF EITHER OF THE TWO PARTIES, SO THAT IF ELECTED, THEY WILL

REMAIN SOLIDLY WITH THE PARTY THEY HAVE CHOSEN AND ACCEPTED

BEFORE FIGHTING ELECTION.

                                         ©   EACH OF THE MAJOR PARTY WILL ALLOW SUCH INDEPENDENTS AND

                                                SPLINTER GROUPS TO PROPOGATE THEIR VIEWS AND PROGRAMMES BUT

                                                WHEN SEATED TOGETHER WITH THE MAJOR PARTY TO WHICH THEY

                                                HAVE ADHERED, TO JOIN, PARTICIPATE, AND PROPOGATE THE AGENDA

                                                OF ITS MAIN ADHERED PARTY, THEY WILL TALK IN ONE VOICE AND

                                                ALSO ON THE MERITS AND BENEFITS OF THE AGENDA OF THEIR

                                               ADHERED PARTY.

HENCE, IN THIS MANNER EITHER OF THE TWO FORMIDABLE STATE OR NATIOANAL PARTIES WILL REMAIN IN POWER FOR THE FULL TERM OF 5 YEARS TO WORK AND GOVERN IN THE MANNER THEY WERE MANADATED TO WORK  WITHOUT ANY FEAR OF FALL AND/OR TO BE PULLED DOWN.

WHY AND WHAT ADVANTAGE THIS 2-PARTY SYSTEM WILL BRING ABOUT TO  THE ELECTORATE AND THE PEOPLE AT LARGE.

THIS 2-PARTY SYSTEM WILL ALLOW

(a)    THE GOVERNING PARTY TO FUNCTION FEARLESSLY                    

WITHOUT ANY SORT OR IN ANY MANNER,  TO BE PULLED DOWN BY ANY UNDESIRABLE/ILLEGAL MEANS ETC. AND AS SUCH WILL POSSIBLY WORK TO IMPLEMENT THEIR AGENDA THEY WERE VOTED FOR.

(b)   THE PARTY IN OPPOSITION WILL REMAIN READY TO TAKE OVER IF

IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES THE GOVERNING PARTY FALLS AND IF

NOT EARLIR, THEN SPECIFICALLY FOR THE NEXT ELECTIONS.

                                             ©    THUS THE GOVERNING PARTY WILL MOSTLY REMAIN ANSWERABLE

                                                     TO THE GOVERNED PARTY REASONABLY GOOD SPIRIT TO REPLY TO

                                                     THEIR QUESTIONS AND WILL ACCEPT THE GOVERNED PARTY AS

                                                     COLLABORATOR THAN EMEMIES IN ANY MANNER.                                                .

In my next chapter, I shall dealing with as to how this 2-party will function in the state and at the centre.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Views expressed by vasdevloonnd are personal, nor are for or against anyone nor against any party.

Vasdevloond is the founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO

 DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY               .. PART XVIII

WE FIND THAT TREND HAS BEEN SENT TO HAVE AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY AND TO WEAKEN THE OPPOSITION AS MUCH THAT IT MAY NEVER COME TO POWER.

THE VERY CREATION OF DEMOCRACY HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACT THAT IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT

THE ELECTORS MUST PARTICIPATE AND ELECT THE PARTY WHO THEY THINK CAN DELIVER THEM  GOOD GOVERNANCE, LAW AND ORDER, TAKE CARE OF WELL BEING OF ALL THE CONSTITUENTS IRRESPECTIVE OF FOR WHOM THEY VOTED TO GOVERN AND WORK FOR THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AS A NATION.

HENCE THE RIGHT TO RAISE ONE’S VOICE AND GIVE ONE’S VIEWS HAVE BEEN GIVEN THROUGH

CONSTITUTION AS HIS/HER FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT AND TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PRO AND AGAINST VIEWS OF THE ELECTORS, MAJORITY HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO GOVERN AND THOSE WHO

TURN OUT TO BE ELECTED IN MINORITY, TO BE IN OPPOSITION TO RAISE THE VOICE OF THEIR VOTE BANK AND THE ELECTORS

THE GOVERNING PARTY THROUGH ITS GOVERNMENING INSTITUTIONS LIKE PARLIAMENT AT THE CENTRE AND ASSEMBLIES IN STATES TO PROPOSE LAWS, GET THESE DISCUSSED, ENACTED AND IMPLEMENTED. HENCE THE OPPOSITION PLAYS THE ROLE TO ANALYSE THE PROPOSED BILLS, DISCUSS AND CONTRIBUTE THEIR BEST TO ENSURE THAT THE PROJECTED BILL WHEN PASSED AND

ENACTED BRINGS IN THE BENEFIT TO THE MASSES AS A WHOLE.

NOW THE QUESTION ARISES WHETHER THE OPPOSITION SHOULD BE FRACTURED WITH SPECIFIC INTERESTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE STATES OR BE A COHERENT ONE TO VOICE THE VIEWS OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE.

IF THE OPPOSITION BECOMES A FRACTURED ONE, THERE IS DANGER THAT THE GOVERNING PARTY WILL CREATE DIVISION AMONGST VARIOUS OPPOSING CONSTITUENTS AND GET THE PROJECTED BILLS PASSED IN THE MANNER, FORM AND SPIRIT THEY WANT THE LAWS TO BE, MOSTLY TO SERVE

THE INTERESTS OF THE VOTE BANK WHEREFROM THE GOVERNING PARTY HAS BEEN ELECTED. AS SUCH CREATING AND EXISTENCE OF OPPOSITION REMAINS JUST FOR NAME SAKE AND DOES NOT BRING IN THE DESIRED RESULTS FOR WHICH THE OPPOSITION WAS CONSITUTIONALLY DESIRED TO BE CREATED.

HENCE TO KEEP THE SPIRIT OF THE CONSITUTION, IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT THERE IS A STRONG OPPOSITION      1. TO GIVE THEIR VIEWS IN ONE VOICE BEFORE THE PROJECTED BILL IS BEING

                                 PASSED, DESPITE THE FACT THAT ELECTED MEMBERS FROM DIFFERENT PARTIES

                                 CAN EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS, TO BRING IN CLARIFICATIONS AND TO SYNTHATHISE

                                 THEIR VIEWS AS A COHERENT OPPOSITION AND CONTRIBUTE THEIR BEST TO 

                                 GET THE PROJECTED BILLS PASSED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NATION AS A 

                                 WHOLE. 

                            2   PARTY IN POWER NECESSARILY HAS TO BELIEVE AND MAKE ALL EFFORTS

                                 TO LISTEN TO OPPOSITION AND ENCOURAGE IT TO REMAIN STRONG TO

                                  OFFER THE MOST CONSTRUCTIVE VIEWS ABOUT THE PROPOSED BILLS

                                  TO BE PASSED INTO LAW.

                            3    IF EXTREMES HAPPEN AND THE GOVERNING PARTY FALLS OFF, THEN

                                   IF THE OPPOSITION IS STRONG AND WELL STRUCTURED, IT COULD MEET

                                   THAT EXIGENCY/EMERGENCY.

                            4     IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL TURMOILS, PARTICIPATION OF STRONG

                                   OPPOSITION COULD OFFER VALUABLE VIEWPOINTS AND HELP THE GOVERNING

                                    PARTY TO TAKE WELL INFORMED AND UNIFIED ACTION TO MEET EMERGENCIES 

                                    LIKE CONFLICTS, WARS, FOREIGN INTERESTS ETC.

                 5   STRONG OPPOSITION IS A NECESSITY BY CONSTITUTION TO OFFER WELL 

                      STUDIED AND FULLY DELIBERATED VIEWS AND AS SUCH IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT

                      THE GOVERNING PARTY ENCOURAGES THE OPPOSITION TO REMAIN UNITED 

                       AND STRON, TO OFFER THEIR VIEWPOINTS IN A VERY CONGENIAL 

                       ATMOSPHERE THAN INDULDGING INTO CONFRONTATION.

IN REALITY AND IN PRACTICE, NONE OF THE GOVERNING PARTY WILL NEVER ENCOURAGE THE VARIOUS OPPOSING PARTIES TO COME TOGETHER AND CRITICISE THE GOVERNING PARTY UNITEDLY AND COHESIVELY WHICH THINKING AND PUTTING THE THINKING INTO ACTION HELPS THE GOVERNING PARTY TO CONTINUE THEIR CONTROLLING AND RULING POWER FOR A LONGER PERIOD AND RULE THE NATION IN THE MANNER THE RULING PARTY WANTS WHICH ENCOURAGES ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO INDULGE  IN ALL TYPES OF COERCIVE AND ILL-LEGITIMATE ACTIONS LIKE CORRUPTION, AMASSING POWER, WEALTH, ETC.ETC.

HENCE HOW TO TACKLE THIS NEGATIVE AND UNCOMPROMISING ATTITUDE, BEHAVIOUR AND ACTION BY THE RULING PARTY TO KEEP THE OPPOSITION FRAGMENTED AND DIVIDED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE INTERESTS, THE ANSWER WILL BE SEARCHED AND ELABORATED IN THE NEXT CHAPTER.

......................................................................

envisioned by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond through 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook.com

      DEMOCRACRY IS AN ILLUSION MOSTLY IN OUR COUNTRY.......... XIX

HOW TO SECURE A STRONG OPPOSITION IS THE QUESTION.

TO MY MIND IT APPEARS THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE STRONG OPPOSITION BOTH IN THE LOWER HOUSE AND IN THE RAJYA SABHA, WHICH COULD BE POSSIBLE IF CONSTITUALLY IT IS ENACTED THAT ….. THERE WILL BE 2-PARTY SYSTEM ALONE AND NO MORE.

IT COULD BE POSSIBLE AFTER 2-PARTY SYSTEM IS ENACTED WHEREIN ALL THOSE ASPIRING ELECTION WILL ADHERE MORALLY AND LEGALLY TO ONE OF THE TWO PARTIES AS PER THEIR

CHOICE.  IT MEANS THAT THEY CAN VOICE THEIR VIEWS TO THE ELECTORATE AND IN PARLIAMENT AS WELL, BUT WILL KEEP ALLEGIANCE ALL THE TIME DURING THEIR TERM FOR THE PARTY THEY HAD CHOSEN AND HAD GOT ELECTED.

IT IS ALSO ESSENTIAL THAT PRESENT LAW OF SHIFTING FROM ONE PARTY TO THE OTHER AFTER ACHIEVING ABOUT 10% NUMBER AS A GROUP, ALSO IS WITHDRAWN AND AS SUCH

ALL THE CHANCES TO SHIFT FROM THE PARTY WHEREFROM HE/SHE GOT ELECTED, GET CLOSED.

THE RULING PARTY WILL ALSO NOT BE TEMPTED TO LURE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELECTED MEMBERS TO GET INTO THEIR PARTY.

IF SOME MEMBER DIES OR IS DEBARRED FOR INDISCIPLINE ETC. THEN NEW MEMBER WILL ALSO BE ELECTED FROM THE SAME PARTY ALONE WHEREFROM THE EARLIER MEMBER WHO HAS DIED OR HAS BEEN DEBARRED.

THEN IT ARISES THE QUESTION AS TO WHICH NUMBER OR PERCENTAGE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED OF THE OPPOSITION WHICH IS STRONG ENOUGH AND THE RULING PARTY FEELS OBLIGED TO CONSULT THE OPPOSITION, LISTEN TO THEIR VIEWS AND ENACT THOSE

INTO LAW IF FOUND VIABLE AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NATION AT LARGE.

HENCE IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DETERMINE THAT NUMBER SO THAT THE RULING PARTY FEELS

COMPELLED TO LISTEN TO THE OPPOSITION

              I THINK BY CONSTITUTION 45% FOR THE OPPOSITION BE STIPULATED AND 55% FOR THE

              RULING PARTY.

              NOW THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO HOW TO ENSURE THAT THE OPPOSITION ACHIEVES THIS

              NUMBER AND SO SHALL BE THE CASE FOR THE RULING PARTY, SHOULD BOTH OR EITHER OF 

              THEM FAILS TO GET THE DESIRED NUMBER.

              NOW THE QUESTION ARISES AS TOHOW TO FILL IN THE MISSING NUMBER, BY ELECTION OR

              BY NOMINATION.  IF THE ELECTION IS HELD AND THE RULING PARTY DOES NOT GET INTO

              ELECTION DRILL, THEN IT WILL BE ONE SIDED VOTE AND POSSIBLY THE ELECTORS WILL NOT

              HAVE THE CHANCE TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON/PARTY OF THEIR LIKING.

               TO COUNTERACT SUCH A SITUATION, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT PARTY CONCERNED IS 

                MANDATED TO GET NOMINATED THOSE WHO ADHERE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

                OF THE PARTY CONCERNED AND IS WELL-KNOWN AND RECOGNISED PROMINENTLY IN A 

                SPECIFIED FIELD.

                 WITH ALL THESE PRECAUTIONS AND MANDATORY STIPULATIONS, THERE WILL DEVELOP

                 A COHERENT OPPOSITION AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RULING AND OPPOSING

                 PARTY WILL DEVELOP INTO UNDERSTANDING, ACCOMMODATION AND ALSO TO VALUE 

                THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY THE OPPOSING PARTY, AND AS SUCH ALL THE ELECTED AND 

                 NOMINATED MEMBERS WILL BE TAKEN AS COLLEAGUES RATHER THAN OPPONENTS AND             

                 BELLIGERENTS.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

envisioned by vasdevloond founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau, to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook:vasdevloond

          DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION MOSTLY IN OUR COUNTRY   XX

THIS PROBLEM SHALL ARISE FOR PARLIAMENT ALONE AND NOT FOR STATES THEMSELVES. 

IN ORDER TO HARMONISE EACH ONE’S VIEWS, AGENDA, BELIEFS ETC. AND TO UNITE THEM 

THIS COULD BE DONE ONLY AND SOLELY THROUGH….  COMMON PROGRAMME.  IT HAS BEEN

DEVISED, FORMULATED AND IS BEING EXECUTED IN MAHARASHTRA DESPITE DIFFERENT  IDEOLOGIES AND DIFFERENT AGENDAS.

IT MEANS THAT DIFFERENT STATES WILL HAVE TO COME TOGETHER FOR ONE OF THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM AND WILL HAVE THUS TO FIGHT ON COMMON PROGRAMME.

HAVING DEVISED AND SUGGESTED OF COMMON PROGRAMME, NOW QUESTION WILL ARISE AS TO HOW TO DECLARE THE NAME OF THE PRIME MINISTER.

FOR THIS, IF THE DIFFERENT STATE PARTIES ADHEREING TO COMMON PROGRAMME CAN ARRIVE AT A DECISION FOR ONE PERSON, THAT WILL BE THE BEST OPTION TO DECLARE THE PRIME MINISTERIAL CANDIDATE AND IF THIS CANNOT BE ARRIVED AT, THEN WHAT COULD BE THE ANSWER?

IN THE PARTY THOSE WHO  HAVE ADHERED TO ONE PARTY, THOSE  WHO WILL BE INTERESTED TO PROPAGATE AND ARE WELL KNOWN TO LURE THE VOTERS AND ARE WELL ESTABLISHED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE STATES, SHOULD BE SELECTED FOR THE PROPAGANDA JOB ON NATIONAL BASIS WHILE THE CHIEF MINSTERS OF EACH STATE WILL PROPAGATE IN THEIR RESPECTIVE STATES AND THOSE SELECTED TO PROPAGATE ON NATIONAL BASIS WILL PROPAGATE IN ALL THE STATES WHICH HAVE ADHERED TO UNITE AND WORK UNDER THE COMMON PROGRAMME.

NOW IF DECISION IS NOT ARRIVED FOR ONE NAME FOR THE PRIME MINISTERIAL POST, THEN THE CHOICE COULD BE LEFT OPEN AFTER THE ELECTION, OF THOSE INTERESTED TO SEEK THE MAJORITY VOTE FROM THE ELECTED MEMBERS.  

IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THOSE STATES WHICH ARE LARGE AND HAVE LARGER QUOTA FOR MPs TO BE

ELECTED COULD EMERGE THE WINNERS AGAINST THOSE STATES WHICH ARE SMALL AND HAVE LEAST OR LESS NUMBER ELECTED MEMBERS.  TRUE, BUT IT CANNOT BE THE FOREGONE 

CONCLUSION AS THOSE CONSISTING OF SMALL STATES, COULD COMBINE TOGETHER TO PUT FORWARD THE NAME OF THE CANDIDATE SELECTED BY THEM TOGETHER.  LIKEWISE THE BIGGER STATES TO MUSTER MAJORITY CAN CONCLUDE FOR THEIR CHOICE OF CANDIDATE AND/OR MUSTER VOTES FROM THE SMALLER PARTIES AND ALSO COULD DECIDE ON VARIOUS POSTS LIKE DEPUTY PRIME MINSTER, SPEAKER, CABINET MINISTERS, STATE MINISTERS ETC. ETC.

HOWEVER THE PARTY WHICH WILL BE ABLE TO DECLARE THE PRIME MINISTER CANDIDATE IN AND DURING THE ELECTION WILL BE, I THINK, IN A BETTER POSITION TO INVITE VOTES IN THAT PARTY’S FAVOUR THAN THE ONE WHICH IS NOT ABLE TO DECIDE IN ADVANCE.

--------------------------------------

views expressed by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, vasdevloond could be contacted at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com www.marriageguidance.in www.facebook:vasdevloond

  DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION, ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY            XXI

ELECTIONS NEED PLANNING TO ENSURE THAT FUNCTIONING OF THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT AFFECTED.

FOR THIS I FEEL, ELECTIONS SHOULD BE HELD TWICE FOR ASSEMBLIES AND ONCE FOR THE PARLIAMENT, TOGETHER AND SIMULTANEOUSLY, WHICH WILL RESULT IN  SAVING ON DEPLOYMENT OF ELECTION STAFF AND SECURITY FORCES.

FURTHER CANVASSING WILL BE FOR STATE LOCAL ISSUES AND NATIONAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE NATION AS A WHOLE AND POSSIBLY THE LEADERS OF THE GOVERNING PARTY AND THOSE IN OPPOSITION IN PARLIAMENT, WILL FOCUS ON QUESTIONS AFFECTING THE NATION AND POSSIBLY WILL NOT INDULGE IN STATE LEVEL CANVASSING AND FIGHTING ELECTION FOR STATES AND AS SUCH THE STATES ELECTIONS WILL BE LEFT TO LOCAL ISSUES AND ELECTIONEERING WILL BE FOUGHT BY LOCAL LEADERS.

DESPITE FINANCIAL GAIN, WHAT WILL BE THE ADVANTAGE FOR HOLDING ELECTION OF ASSEMBLIES  TWICE AND FOR PARLIAMENT ONCE ONLY?.

ELECTION FOR ASSEMBLIES NEEDS TO BE HELD IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TERM I.E. AFTER 2.1/2 YEARS.

STATE ASSEMBLIES ELECTIONS NEED TO BE HELD OF ALL THE STATES TOGETHER SIMULTANEOUSL AT THE SAME TIME. WHY SO, IS THE QUESTION:

ASSEMBLIES ELECTIONS DURING THE MID TERM WILL ALLOW THE GOVERNING PARTY AND IN OPPOSITION TO PROPAGATE ABOUT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMMES SET IN THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENDA, ALONG WITH STATE GOVERNING PARTY AND THOSE IN OPPOSITION, EACH ONE EXPLAINING AND PROPAGATING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGENDA THEY HAD FOUGHT THE ELECTION IN THE STATES AND THE OPPOSITION BRINGING OUT THE FAILURES OF THE GOVERNING PARTY, ADVISING ALTERNATIVES AND CORRECTIONS AND ALSO HIGHLIGHTINT THE ADVANTAGES AND BENEFITS OF THEIR PROGRAMMES DETAILED IN THEIR ELECTION AGENDA..

THE GOVERNING PARTY AT THE CENTRE WILL CONCENTRATE MORE IN PERFORMANCE AND WILL NOT BE ENGAGEIN MANY TIMES FOR THE ELECTIONS IF HELD OF DIFFERENT STATES AT DIFFERENT TIMES.

FURTHER THE GOVERNING PARTY AND THOSE IN OPPOSITION WILL WORK THEIR BEST TO ANSWER TO THE VOTERS ONLY ONCE DURING THEIR TERM TO TEST AS TO WHAT EXTENT THE VOTERS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE WORKING OF THE GOVERNING PARTY AND THE OPPOSITION.

HENCE THE GOVERNING PARTY AFTER THE RESULTS OF THE STATE ASSEMBLIES ARE DECLARED ARE ABLE TO KNOW ABOUT THE MOOD OF THE VOTERS FOR THE ELECTION TO BE HELD AFTER 2.1/2 YEARS FOR PARLIAMENT AND THE ASSEMBLIES AND MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS TO CHANGE THE MOOD OF THE VOTERS TO ELECT THE GOVERNING PARTY TO THE NEXT TERM AND THE OPPOSITION WORKS HARD TO CRITICISE AND HIGHLIGHT THEIR PROGRAMMES SO THAT VOTERS FEEL INCLINED TO VOTE FOR THE OPPOSITION AND ELECT THEM TO POWER WHEN ELECTIONS ARE HELD.

AS A RESULT THEREOF, THE DEVELOPMENT AND WELFARE OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE IN GENERAL IS TAKEN CARE OF, WHICH ALSO AT THE SAME TIME HELPS THE VOTERS TO BE WELL INFORMED TO EXERCISE THEIR VOTE AT THE TIME OF ELECTION.

HOW TO TRUST EVMs?

DESPITE ALL THIS, IT IS SAID THAT ELECTIONS BESIDES OFFER OF FEEBIES, INFLUENCES, MONEY MANIPULATIONS, ELECTIONS COULD BE HELD BY THE ELECTION COMMISSION IN FAIR AND FOOLPROOF SYSTEM AND AS SUCH HAVE INTRODUCED VOTING TO BE CONDUCTED THROUGH EVMs, (ELECTRIC VOTING MACHINES).  IN EVERY ELECTION, THE USE OF EVMs IS QUESTIONED AND CRITICISED BY THE OPPOSITION FOR MANIPULATION BY THE GOVERNING PARTY. IT IS SAID MACHINES ARE MACHINES, THEIR CHIPS ARE HIJACKED AND MANIPULATED BY THE CONSTRUCTORS TO THE ADVANTAGE OF THE GOVERNING PARTY, AS IT IS THEY WHO GIVE THEM THESE CONTRACTS AND ALSO MAKE THEM PAYMENT OF THE JOB DONE, HENCE THERE ARE MANY CHANCES THAT THE GOVERNING PARTY COULD GET THESE MANIPULATED BY ALL MEANS TO THEIR FAVOUR..

THE QUESTION ARISES AS TO HOW TO SAFEGUARD THE GENUINENESS OF THE VOTES AND AS SUCH AVOID CRITICISM BY THE OPPOSITION IN EVERY ELECTION?

I THINK, EVMs MUST BE SENT TO EACH POOLING BOOTH AT LEAST 15 DAYS IN ADVANCE AND THE ELECTION COMMISSION STAFF POSTED AT EACH BOOTH, INVITES ALL THE CANDIDATES PREFERABLY TOGETHER TO ALLOW EACH OF THEM TO OPERATE ON THE EVMs MACHINE(S) AND CHECK THE CORRECTNESS OF THEIR VOTING.   THE VOTES CAST BY ALL THE CONTESTANTS AS SUCH BE COUNTED AS THEY HAVING EXERCISED THEIR VOTING POWER, AND AS SUCH ARE NOT ALLOWED TO VOTE HEREAFTER, 2nd TIME. FURTHER IF THE EVM MACHINE FAILS AND IS FOUND DEFECTIVE IT IS REPLACED BY A NEW ONE AND IS TESTED BY ALL THE CONTESTANTS AGAIN,

FURTHER WHEN VOTING IS COMPLETED, THE EVMs MACHINE(S) BE FIRMLY LOCKED, SEALED AND SIGNED BY EACH OF THE CONCESTANTS WHICH COULD BE DONE THROUGH PUTTING IN LOCK CLOSURES AT MANY PLACES ON THE DOOR AND IF THE SPACE IS NOT ENOUGH, TO PUT WIDHTHWISE BARS WITH LOCK CLOSURE FACILTY ETC. ETC. AND EACH CONTESTANT KEEPS HIS/HER KEY TO HIMSELF/HERSELF TO OPEN THE LOCK CONCERED WHEN THE COUNTING STARTS.

THEN THERE IS ALSO CRITICISM THAT EVMs ARE SHIFTED TO KEEP THESE AT ONE PLACE, MY ANSWER WILL BE NO, NOT AT ALL, UNTIL THE RESULTS ARE DECLARED, THESE MACHINES MUST REMAIN IN THE BOOTH(S) WHERE THE VOTES WERE EXERCISED AND REMOVED ONLY AFTER ABOUT A WEEK WHEN THE ELECTIONS ARE DECLARED.

IT IS ALSO SAID THAT DURING THE COUNTING, SERVER DROPS AND DOES NOT FUNCTION AND AS SUCH EVMS MACHINES ARE MANIPULATED AND/OR REPLACED, TO THIS MY ANSWER, WILL BE THAT IN SUCH A SITUATION, AS THE FACILITY OF PUTTING IN MANY LOCKS IS PROVIDED TO EACH INDIVIDUAL CONTESTANT, TO OPEN NEXT DAY FOR COUNTING, THE CHANCE, IF ANY FOR MANIPULATION, WILL BE TOTALLY AVOIDED AS EACH OF THE CONSTANT WILL REOPEN THE LOCK HE/SHE HAD CLOSED AND AS A RESULLT NONE COULD ENTER INTO THE EVM ROOM DURING THE NIGHT/HOLIDAYS/WEEKENDS ETC.

FURTHER EACH AND ALL CONTESTANTS IF THEY WISH SO, REMAIN PRESENT OR KEEP HIS/HER TRUSTEE AT THE POLLING BOTH FOR 24 HOURS UNTIL THE COUNTING IS DONE AND RESULTS ARE DECLARED.

I BELIEVE IF THESE SAFEGUARDS, AS SUGGESTED ABOVE, ARE TAKEN CARE, THE CHANCES FOR CRITICISM ABOUT THE USE AND MANIPULATION OF EVMs WILL BE AVOIDED.

.....................................................................

views expressed by vasdevloond are his own, without any influence or bias. vasdevloond is running his marriage bureau titled Marriage Guidance New Concept, Cost Free, NGO, to contact vasdevloond at 9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com

                DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION, ESPECIALLY IN OUR COUNTRY……….   XXII

ELECTIONS NEED TO BE FOUGHT ON AGENDA, PERFORMANCE, ESSENTIAL AND OBLIGATORY. NEEDN’T BE ALLOWED TO HURLE ACCUSATIONS, HOW THE PREDECESSORS PERFORMED, HOW THOSE IN OPPOSITION FAILED WHEN IT WAS IN POWER.

THE ELECTION FIGHT MUST BE BASED ON THE AGENDA, PERFORMANCE AND WELFAFE OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE.

NO DIVISION TACTICS, NO RELIGIOUS ANTAGONISM, NO PERSONAL ACCUSATIONS, NOT EVEN TO ACCUSE EACH OTHER NEITHER THE OPPOSITION NOR THE GOVERNING PARTY IN ANY MANNER AND AS SUCH PRIMARILY AND PRINCIPALLY TO CONCENTRATE ON THEIR PERFORMANCE.

AS SUCH THE GOVERNING PARTY WILL CONCENTRATE TO HIGHLIGHTING WHAT THEY HAVE DONE AS PER THEIR PROMISES IN THE AGENDA, WHAT IS IN PIPELINE AND ALSO WHAT COULD NOT BE DONE, AND WHAT WERE THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PREVENTED THEM OR HINDERED THE EXUCTION AND PERFORMANCE, MAYBE SOME OF THE AGENDA ITEM HAD TO BE ABANDONED, WHAT FOR AND FOR WHAT REASONS.

LIKEWISE OPPOSITION WILL FIGHT ELECTIONS ON THE BASIS OF THEIR AGENDA, WHAT THEY COULD DO, WHAT THEY PERFORMED AND WHAT THEY COULD NOT BEING IN OPPOSITION AND ALSO TO

CONCENTRATE IF NOW VOTED TO POWER, WHAT AND HOW THEY WILL BE ABLE TO PERFORM AS PER THEIR PROMISES IN THE AGENDA.

IF THESE ARE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS, THEN LOCAL ISSUES WILL BE RAISED WITH REGARD TO PERFORMACE AND ON THEIR FUTURE AGENDA AND FOR PARLIAMENT LIKEWISE  ONLY NATIONAL ISSUES BE RAISED OF PERFORMANCE AND ON FUTURE AGENDA.

NOW THE QUESTION ARISES WHETHER QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OPPOSITION DID NOT SUPPORT AND/OR HINDER THE GOVERNING PARTY IN THEIR PERFORMACE AND THE OPPOSITION ACCUSING THE GOVERNING PARTY THAT THEY EMPLOYED ALL MEANS TO DIVIDE THE OPPOSITION, DID NOT ALLOW THEM TIME TO RAISE THEIR VOICE AND ELABORATE ON THE PROPOSED SUBJECTS TO BE ENACTED INTO LAW AND THE WORST OF ALL THE GOVERNING PARTY DID ALL TO DAMAGE THEM IN DISCUSSIONS, MEDIA AND BY ALL MEANS, IN NO WAY TO ENCOURAGE BUT INSTEAD TO WEAKEN THE OPPOSITION BY ALL MEANS.

I THINK SUCH ACCUSATIONS NEEDN’T BE ALLOWED AND INSTEADMUST BE COMPELLED TO SPECIFY IN EACH ONE’S AGENDA

THAT THEY COMMIT AND UNDERSTAND THAT FOR FUNCTIONG OF DEMOCRACY IT IS ESSENTIAL TO HAVE GOVERNING PARTY IN POWER AND OPPOSITION AS WELL TO VOICE WHAT THE OPPOSITION FEELS WILL AND IS NOT IN THE INTEREST OF THE NATION AND AS SUCH BOTH COMMIT TO WORK IN FULL COHESION AND FULL COLLABORATION FOR DOING ALL WHAT IS FOR THE WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATION AND ALSO TO COMMIT, IF FOR SOME REASONS OF OTHER, SMOOTH FUNCTIONING DID NOT HAPPEN, ON REQUEST OF THE OPPOSITION, THE GOVERNING PARTY WILL CONSTITUE A COMMITTEE WITH RENOWNED REPRESENTATIVES AND PERHAPS ADDED WITH SOME MEMBERS OF THE UPPER HOUSE, HEADED BY THE SPEAKER OF HOUSE, TO SORT OUT THE DIFFERENCES AND WORK ON SMOOTH WORKING OF THE PARLIAMENT AND RAJYA SABHA AS WELL.

ELECTION TO THE COMMITTEE WILL BE LEFT TO EACH OF THEM AS THEY LIKE AND ALL MEMBERS OF THE SUCH A COMMITTEE ARE MADE TO COMMIT AND VOUCH THAT THEY WILL BE FUNCTIONING IN RESPECT OF EACH OTHER, ELABORATING ON REASONS AND GIVING NECESSARY ANSWERS AS TO HOW THE SMOOTH WORKING COULD BE MANAGED, CAREFULLY KEEPING IN VIEW THAT THEY ARE NOT TO ACCUSE ANY OF THEM AND HAVE TO CONCENTRATE ON REASONS AND FINDING OUT BEST ANSWER FOR THE SMOOTH WORKING OF THE PARLIAMENT.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

….XXIII       30-4-22

ALL INSTITUTIONS AD DEFINED IN THE CONSTITUTION WHICH ARE FOR THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC AT LARGE LIKE 1. ELECTION COMMISSION 2. JUDICIARY. ED, INCOME TAX COMMISSIONERS,  ETC. HAVE TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO  WAY THERE SHOULD BE ANY POLITICAL OR THE GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE OF ANY SORT. THEN HOW TO DO AND WHY THESE ARE NOT KEPT INDEPENDENT?

ELECTION COMMISSION; AT PRESENT. ELECTION COMMISSIONERS ARE APPOINTED BY THE PM OFFICE MANDAGED FOR A TENURE OF 5 YEARS.  PERHAPS THE REASON ADVANCED IS THAT IT IS BE HEADED AND CONDUCTED BY BUREAUCRATS WHO ARE WELL VERSED WITH THE SYSTEM AND ALSO AS THE  PM WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION  AND CONDUCT OF SUCH INSTITUTIONS BEING THE PRIME MINISTER ANDHAVING  SOLE AUTHORITY MANDATED BY CONSTITUTION AS ALSO BY THE PUBLIC, THE SELECTION OF ELECTION COMMISSION NEEDS TO BE WITH THE PM.

DRAWBACK AS I THINK AND GENERALLY CRITICISED BY THE OPPOSITION, MEDIA ETC. SELECTION BY THE PM GETS VICIOUS AND QUESTIONABLE AS SUCH THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER GETS INFLUENCED AND BIASED TO GET THESE COVETED POSTS, MOSTLY BY THE TIME OF RETIREMENT

AND GENERALLY IT IS BELIEVED, LOOKS TO THE INTERESTS OF THE GOVERNING PARTY THAN THE PUBLIC AT LARGE.

EVMs FOR THIS REASON HAVE BEEN GREATLY QUESTIONED AND DESPITE THE FACT THAT COMPLAINTS CAN BE MADE WITH THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BUT FOR DECISION TAKING HE IS THE SOLE AND UNQUESTIONAL COMMANDER. COMPLAINTS HAVE ALSO COME ABOUT REJECTING THE PAPERS TO BE FILED AND MINOR IRREGULARITIES FOUND AND POSSIBLY NO TIME GIVEN TO CLARIFY AND CORRECT THESE, LIKEWISE THERE ARE MANY INSTANCES WHERE IMPARTIALITY OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION IS PUT TO DOUBT.

IN GENRAL THERE IS NO DOUBT WHEN ANY BUREAUCRATIC WHO HAS SERVED ALL ALONG DURING HIS/HER TENURE IN COMPLETE OBEDIENCE, WHEN GIVEN CHANCE FOR FURTHER 5 YEARS JUST BEFORE RETIREMENT, THAT BREAUCRAT IT IS BUT NATURAL WILL BE GRATEFUL AND OBEDIENT TO DO WHAT HIS MASTERS ARE DESIRING, MOSTLY BY THE PM AND HIS CABINET SECRETARIES ETC.

IN ANSWER TO THIS, I FEEL, RENOWNED PERSONALITIES MUST HOLD SUCH OFFICES OF ELECTION COMMISSION, THEN THE QUESTION WILL ARISE WHO WILL DO THE SELECTIONS AND GET THEM APPOINTED OR NOMINATED.(A)  POSSIBLY THERE COULD BE ANSWER THAT CHIEF JUSTICE AFTER RETIREMENT BECOMES THE ELECTION COMMISSION BY SENIORITY AND PERHAPS BY SUCH A SYSTEM INFLUENCE OF SELECTION AND POWER ATTACHED AT PRESENT THERETO WILL BE WIPED OUT. FURTHER THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT CHIEF JUSTICES ARE KNOWN FOR THEIR IMPARTIALITY AND HAVE ALSO BEEN RUNNING THE BUREAUCRATIC SYSTEM IN JUDICIARIES AT ALL LEVELS.

HENCE IN ANSWER FOR SELECTION OF THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER AUTOMATICLLY IS HEADED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE ON THE BASIS OF SENIORITY (B) FOR ONE YEAR ONLY. HENCE THE JUNIORS TO HIM GET THE CHANCE AND ALSO GET TRAINED IN THE POST WHILE WORKING WITH THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER. WHY FOR ONE YEAR INSTEAD OF 5 YEARS AS AT PRESENT. I THINK ONE YEAR WILL BE BETTER TO GIVE CHANCE TO OTHER CHIEF JUSTICES AND SINCE THE TENURE WILL BE FOR ONE YEAR, THERE WILL BE THE LEAST CHANCE TO BE INFLUENCED IN ANY MANNER.

IN CASE CERTAIN CASES ARISE WHERE THERE ARE DIFFERENT VIEWS OF THE JUNIORS AND THE

CHIEF JUSTICE AS ELECTION COMMISIONER, THE DECISION AND RULING OF THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER WILL BE FINAL AND WHICH COULD BE QUESTIONED AND LEGALLY DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT AFTER THE RETIRMENT OF THE SAID ELECTION COMMISSIONER, SO THAT IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY LAPSE, IT IS NOT REPEATED HEREAFTER.

ED, INCOME TAX ETC. INDEPENDENT DEPARTMENTS;

SAME RULE MUST APPLY FOR THE OFFICES OF THE ED, INCOME TAX, AND THE ALIKE INDEPENDENT DEPARTMENTS CREATED FOR IMPARTIALITY AND JUSTICE TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE.

SUPREME COURT AND JUDICIARIES;

TOTAL SLECTIONS AND MANAGEMENT MUST BE LEFT TO THE JUDICIARIES THEMSELVES IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE PM IS TO GET THE LAWS PASSED AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND EXECUTION OF THE LAWS PASSED BY THE PARLIAMENT.

HENCE THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF RECOMMENDATION BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND FINAL DECISION

BY THE PM AND ITS CABINET, I THINK, SHOULD BE ABANDONED.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Personal views envisioned and expressed by vasdevloond, founder of marriage guidance new concept, cost free marriage bureau NGO, to contact vasdevloond at9811943867 vasdevloond@gmail.com   www.marriagguidance.in  www.facebook.com